Miscellaneous
July 31, 2003
Israel Passes Law Blocking Residency Permits For Israeli/Palestinian Marriages

Reaction #1: This is so sad.

Reaction #2: Ouch! Bad timing guys. I thought Israel was supposed to be in the process of building goodwill towards the Palestinian people. This can't be a step in the right direction.

New Law for Israeli-Palestinian Couples
By Gavin Rabinowitz for the Associated Press.


Israel's parliament on Thursday passed a new law that would force Palestinians who marry Israelis to live separate lives or move out of Israel despite charges from human rights groups and Israeli Arabs that the law is racist.

The law would prevent Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza Strip who marry Israeli Arabs from obtaining residency permits in Israel...

"This is a racist law that decides who can live here according to racist criteria," said Yael Stein from the Israeli rights group B'tselem.

Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have sent letters to the parliament protesting the law and urging lawmakers not to pass it, a statement from Human Rights Watch said.

Here is the full text of the article in case the link goes bad:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-2974045,00.html

New Law for Israeli-Palestinian Couples


Thursday July 31, 2003 4:39 PM

By GAVIN RABINOWITZ

Associated Press Writer

JERUSALEM (AP) - Israel's parliament on Thursday passed a new law that would force Palestinians who marry Israelis to live separate lives or move out of Israel despite charges from human rights groups and Israeli Arabs that the law is racist.

The law would prevent Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza Strip who marry Israeli Arabs from obtaining residency permits in Israel.

The vote was 53 in favor, 25 against and one abstention, a spokeswoman for the parliament said.

``We see this law as the implementation of the transfer policy by the state of Israel,'' said Jafar Savah from Mossawa, an advocacy center for Israeli Arabs, referring to a plan by far right groups to transfer Israeli Arabs to other Arab countries.

Savah said the law was an attempt to legalize unofficial policy that has been in effect since September 2000 when violence broke out and warned that the law would damage relations between Israel and its Arab minority.

Both local and international human rights groups have condemned the law as racist.

``This is a racist law that decides who can live here according to racist criteria,'' said Yael Stein from the Israeli rights group B'tselem.

Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have sent letters to the parliament protesting the law and urging lawmakers not to pass it, a statement from Human Rights Watch said.

Israel's government contends that such a law is necessary for security reasons, citing instances where Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza have exploited their residency permits, granting them freedom of movement in Israel, to carry out terror attacks.

``This law comes to address a security issue,'' Cabinet Minister Gideon Ezra told Israel Radio. ``Since September 2000 we have seen a significant connection, in terror attacks, between Arabs from the West Bank and Gaza and Israeli Arabs,'' Ezra said.

Israel and the Palestinians have been locked in a bloody conflict for 33 months, though a cease-fire declared by the Palestinians on June 29 has significantly reduced violence.

The law, which passed its first reading on June 18, would force newly married couples to choose between living in the Palestinian areas or living separately and would be in effect for a year when the parliament must renew it.

It is not uncommon for members of Israel's 1 million strong Arab community to marry residents of the Palestinian areas, and this was one of the only ways a Palestinian could be eligible for an Israeli residency permit.

Ezra told the radio that since 1993 over 100,000 Palestinians have obtained Israeli permits in this manner. ``It has grown out of control,'' he said.

Stein from B'tselem said there have been only 20 cases from these 100,000 people who have been involved in terror.

``I am not taking these attacks lightly but this is an extreme solution to a marginal phenomenon,'' Stein said.

Ezra turned aside charges that the law was racist, saying ``I agree that anyone who kills Jews just because they are Jewish is a racist.''

Rights groups accused Israel of trying to rush the bill through parliament before it goes into recess on August 3.

Posted by Lisa at July 31, 2003 10:02 AM | TrackBack
Me A to Z (A Work In Progress)
Comments

Oh, they're obviously doing it to punish Israelis who don't hate Palestinians like they're supposed to. And of course it's backfiring in that it's actually shining a light on how many residents of the country (on both ends) reject the hatred, something the world at large might not have otherwise known.

Posted by: Elayne Riggs on July 31, 2003 02:24 PM

How typical the laws of love are made illegal through the laws of a state.

FreedomHaters.com opposes this view.

Posted by: Adrian Cahill on August 1, 2003 03:54 AM

This is a horrible law. It should be changed.

In criticising it, though, it's constructive to have the facts. Elayne, the Israelis it's targetting are largely Israeli Arabs, not Israeli Jews -- who in any case have a hard time marrying Muslims or Christians, Israeli or Palestinian or otherwise, because of Israel's lack of a civil marriage option. (Hence the Cyprus marriage industry.)

Particularly because the law is largely about marriage between Israeli Arabs and Palestinian Arabs, I don't think "racist" is appropriate. Rather, it's immoral. It's true that Israel and nascent Palestine are at war, but -- particularly because they are currently at temporary truce (hudna) -- Palestinians who marry Israeli citizens should certainly be extended Israeli citizenship.

If Canada (where I live) and the U.S. were at war, and I married an American, I would think it rather horrible that the person I'd married not automatically obtain Canadian citizenship. Same goes here.

Posted by: Nanook on August 2, 2003 06:42 PM

How far can you balanced, both sides to the story, liberals go to excuse a apartheid state?

The latest addition to Israels race laws is only one example of the Israeli jews first racist policy wich the country is built on.

Forget about the so called complicated background, and that there are worse places, that some biggots are antisemites and the usual excuses.

Howcome that sometimes racism is a matter of discussion and light critisism.
Explain why apartheid is ok when it comes to Israel.

Dan

Posted by: Oman on August 16, 2003 04:04 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


No free link advertizing is allowed here. If you post a commercial link in this comment you agree to pay me $500 per link pursuant to the Terms posted here. Type "AGREE" here:

Comments:


Remember info?