Meet The Press Archive
March 28, 2004
Richard Clarke On Meet The Press

This is from the March 28, 2004 program of
Meet the Press

This one's only available in four parts. They're too big and they overlap a little.

Richard Clarke On Meet The Press


Posted by Lisa at March 28, 2004 07:55 PM | TrackBack
Me A to Z (A Work In Progress)

Thanks, Lisa, from one of many cable-less (and so NBC-less) Berkeleyan.

Posted by: jon on March 29, 2004 01:55 PM

Arbitrarily breaking copyright laws again, Lisa? Is this what "Creative Commons" is all about? You should rename it "Creative Piracy" since you're just a two-cent pirate. This site needs to be shut down ASAP.

Posted by: Richard on March 30, 2004 10:43 AM

Talk about the "house of cards collapsing": On The Daily Show last night, John Stewart asked Richard Clarke if he and CIA director George Tenet worked for years to make President Clinton grasp the importance of terrorism. Clarke answered that the reverse was true, that Clinton was the one who made Clarke and Tenet see the light.

Clinton made practically no response to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the 1993 assassination attempt against former President Bush in Kuwait, the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing, the 1998 Kenya embassy bombing, and the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole. Clarke's description of Clinton is farcical.

Mickey Kaus is a Democrat who's rooting for Bush to lose, and even he (Kaus) recognizes that Clarke is a partisan hack.

Posted by: Michael on March 31, 2004 07:38 AM

Thanks for posting this. I hope viewers will retain some skepticism for Clarke. We still haven't seen strong evidence that 'al queda' or bin Laden were behind the 9/11 attacks.

Posted by: Brad Johnson on March 31, 2004 05:08 PM

Thank you so much, Lisa! I had missed this.

Posted by: Christine on April 1, 2004 12:17 AM

You are a champion Lisa!

Posted by: on April 2, 2004 01:18 AM

OT: Lisa, Karen Hughes is coming to a Clean Well Lighted Place to plug her book on April 6 at 7pm. Do you have friends in the community who might like to take this opportunity to engage our new shill-in-chief in a friendly, spirited manner?

Posted by: jon on April 2, 2004 11:18 AM

Anna, if not aq, it could have been an inside job. Certainly elements of the administration were complicit, but it's hard to tell to what extent. Some people are trying to find out.

Posted by: J Bradley Johnson on April 2, 2004 09:38 PM

This article give some reasons as to why someone might want to be skeptical of Clarke right now.

Posted by: J Bradley Johnson on April 5, 2004 01:54 PM
Post a comment

Email Address:


No free link advertizing is allowed here. If you post a commercial link in this comment you agree to pay me $500 per link pursuant to the Terms posted here. Type "AGREE" here:


Remember info?