Rosenthal Jurors Say They Were Double-Crossed By The Judge

Here’s some background on the case. (More)
The Jurors in the Ed Rosenthal Medical Marijuana Growing trail are plenty pissed that U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer manipulated the case in order to secure a conviction.
Jurors Denounce Their Own Verdict
By Ann Harrison for AlterNet.

After she and her fellow jurors found Ed Rosenthal guilty of federal marijuana cultivation and conspiracy charges in San Francisco last week, Marney Craig discovered that that she had made a terrible mistake.
Instead of the “businessman” she thought she had convicted, Craig learned that Rosenthal, was, in fact, a widely published marijuana advocate who had been asked to grow medical cannabis for critically ill patients. The judge had kept this information from jurors, because Rosenthal was tried under federal drug laws that do not recognize the medicinal use of marijuana.
“What happened was a travesty and it’s unbelievable, unbelievable that this man was convicted. I am just devastated,” said Craig. “We made a terrible mistake and he should not be going to prison for this.”
Craig is not alone in her remorse. Five other jurors, including the jury foreman, are expected to join Craig to denounce the verdict in a joint press conference this week. The event will take place immediately after a hearing to determine whether prosecutors will succeed in revoking Rosenthal’s $200,000 cash bond and send him to jail until sentencing on June 4. Attorneys for Rosenthal, who is facing five to 20 years in prison, say they will ask an appeals court for a new trial.
“I was not allowed to tell my story,” said Rosenthal. “If the jury had been allowed to hear the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, I would have been acquitted.”
Juror Debra DeMartini said she was distressed to discover that Rosenthal had been deputized by the city of Oakland, California to grow marijuana for its medical cannabis program. Oakland city officials testified during pre-trail hearings that they had tried to reconcile the conflict between the federal Controlled Substances Act, which bans all marijuana cultivation, and California’s Compassionate Use Act (Prop. 215) which permits patients to possess, consume and grow their own medical cannabis.
In an effort to provide medical cannabis to patients who could not grow their own, the city granted Rosenthal immunity from prosecution under a section of the Controlled Substances Act. But U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer halted every attempt by the defense team to directly tell jurors for whom Rosenthal’s marijuana was being grown and blocked city officials from explaining Rosenthal’s deputization during the trial…
Down at San Francisco City Hall, Matt Gonzalez, president of the city’s Board of Supervisors, or city council, said jurors in cases like Rosenthal’s should know that they can simply refuse to follow federal law. “The judge is not giving the jury any space, whatsoever, to engage in what has been an extremely long tradition in common law as it relates to jury nullification,” said Gonzalez.
Craig said she believed that if she had taken a stand during deliberations and said the federal law was wrong, she would have been removed from the jury. “I didn’t know what would happen to us if we didn’t follow the rules, how much trouble I would get into,” said Craig. “I was totally intimidated into going along with the verdict because I didn’t see any other way.”
San Francisco public defender Jeff Adachi noted that there have been a number of decisions involving jury nullification in which judges have removed jurors who have refused to convict. But he said a jury instruction that permitted this was ruled to be unconstitutional in the last year. “Over the past 20 years, there has been a movement to limit the power of the jury by keeping the jury ignorant of the facts,” said Adachi. “Jury nullification is a constitutional right that every individual person who is called for jury duty possesses, and unless we appreciate that right, we will lose it because the courts will take it from us.”
In the meantime, Adachi warned that Rosenthal’s conviction will encourage federal authorities to arrest more medical cannabis growers and distributors. “The kind of prosecution that we are seeing in the Rosenthal case could be multiplied 50 or 100 times over in the next year or two here,” said Adachi.

Continue reading

Virginian Republicans Challenge Womens’ Reproductive Rights

Note: this is going on in Virginia. Not up in D.C.
Nevertheless — heads up people!
Get ready for a full on attack on a woman’s right to choose in the months to come.
5 Antiabortion Bills Advance in House
By Steven Ginsberg for the Washington Post.

Virginia’s House of Delegates approved a bill today that would allow health care workers to invoke a “conscience clause” if they wish to avoid participating in abortion or birth control procedures.
The measure was among five abortion limits that cleared various stages in the General Assembly, and activists on both sides of the issue said they were predicting a landmark year for abortion regulation in Virginia…
…The Senate narrowly upheld Warner’s late-term veto last year, but abortion opponents said they believe they have the votes to override one this year.
Despite the possibility of several new restrictions, abortion rights activists were pleased with the defeat of the clinic regulation bill, because they said its tough regulations would have forced most abortion clinics to close.
“It was the most important vote in the General Assembly so far on whether abortion rights would still be available to the women of Virginia,” said Bennet Greenberg, director of government relations at Planned Parenthood Advocates of Virginia, an abortion rights group.
Sen. Ken Cuccinelli (R-Fairfax), sponsor of the bill, said he would try to “come up with an alternate scheme that would improve the health and safety in those clinics. It can be done, and it can be done in this session.”…
“There’s been nothing like this, this wave of anti-choice legislation,” Sen. Janet D. Howell (D-Fairfax) said…

Continue reading

Courtney Love vs. Virgin Airlines’ Flight Attendants

Foolish Courtney. 911 changed everything.
Now Flight Attendants rule the skies!
Now we have to keep them happy.
Singer Love warned after flight incident
From the BBC.

Rock star and actress Courtney Love has been released with a warning by police in London for “causing harassment, alarm and distress” on a transatlantic flight.
The 38-year-old was arrested at Heathrow Airport on Tuesday morning after allegedly being verbally abusive to cabin crew…
She told waiting reporters the “brief verbal disagreement” had been “highly exaggerated”.
She said: “I cussed at a lady – my daughter always said I had a potty mouth – I cussed at a lady named Mary, she wasn’t letting my friend into first class and I said, why are you being such a bitch about it.”
…And asked what the previous nine hours had been like inside the police station, the singer said: “It was fine. They were wonderful in there. It was like being on Prime Suspect.”

Continue reading

MP3’s Of KQED Radio Show On Crowd Estimation

Sorry it took me so long to get these prepared. I wanted to make them available in a few different sizes for people, and had to make sure the pieces were all complete, etc.
This radio broadcasts explains everything you ever wanted to know about crowd estimation and solves many of the myth’s about it.
Hear, straight from the sources (the cops, computer crowd estimation experts, historians), how there is no such thing as an “official count” and how everyone is in basic agreement on the count of the January 18, 2003 protest in San Francisco (150,000-200,000), learn about the latest in computer-oriented crowd estimation techniques, and discover how the methods for determining their size and scope of peaceful demonstrations have evolved over the last century.
The situation surrounding the Million Man March is also discussed in detail. Really neat stuff!
Media cycle: Radio/Cassette Tape/Video Camera/Computer
Hope you enjoy it:
MP3s of KQED Forum’s Crowd Estimation Progra
Host: Angie Coiro
Guests:
Dr. Farouk el Baz, Director of the Center for Remote Sensing at Boston University
David Brunelle, Public Affairs Officer for Capital Protection
Lucy Barber, Archivist at the California State Archives and author of “Marching on Washington: The Forging of an American Political Tradition
Gregory Suhr, Deputy Chief of the San Francisco Police Department

What Did Cheney Know About The California Energy Crisis Scam?

FERC Gives Another Energy Company A Slap On the Wrist For Ripping Off California
Latest Smoking Gun Evidence Shows Reliant Energy Withheld Power From Consumers During Height of Energy Crisis
By Jason Leopold for Scoop.

A few weeks before the meeting between Bush and Davis, Vice President Dick Cheney, who chairs Bush’s energy task force, was interviewed by PBS’ Frontline for a special series on California’s energy crisis. During the interview, Cheney flat-out denied that energy companies ripped off California.
“The problem you had in California was caused by a combination of things – an unwise regulatory scheme, because they didn’t really deregulate,” Cheney said in the May 17 Frontline interview. “Now they

Janis Ian’s Response To The RIAA vs. Verizon Verdict

Don’t Sever a High-Tech Lifeline for Musicians
By Janis Ian for the LA Times

The entertainment industry has a long history of trying to shut down new technology. Most often, it has imagined that new products and services threatened industry sales. It’s been proved wrong time and time again; it fought home video tooth and nail, but videotapes and rentals now bring in more money than movie releases. Music history is littered with record industry campaigns against reel-to-reel home tape recorders, cassettes, minidiscs, music videos and MTV.
Verizon is appealing the decision, and it is vital that the judge’s ruling be overturned.
The RIAA says it is doing all this to make more money for me and other artists like me, but don’t be fooled. Many musicians would lose money, many fans would be denied a universe of new choices and the possibilities of Internet music would be cut off before the revolution even begins.

Continue reading

Visa Database Being Handed Over To The Cops

State Department Link Will Open Visa Database to Police Officers
By Jennifer Lee for the NY Times.

Law enforcement officials across the country will soon have access to a database of 50 million overseas applications for United States visas, including the photographs of 20 million applicants.
The database, which will become one of the largest offering images to local law enforcement, is maintained by the State Department and typically provides personal information like the applicant’s home address, date of birth and passport number, and the names of relatives…
For all the ambitious technological proposals being debated in the wake of the 2001 terror attacks, the new unified system was cobbled from existing networks and has required little new spending. “These are the networks that people are already using,” said Roseanne Hynes, a member of the Defense Department’s domestic security task force. “It doesn’t change jobs or add overhead.”
A primary feature of the system is the State Department’s enormous visa database, whose seven terabytes give it a capacity equivalent to that of five million floppy disks. Until now, that database has been shared only with immigration officials.
“There is a potential source of information that isn’t available elsewhere,” said M. Miles Matthew, a senior Justice Department official who works with an interagency drug intelligence group. “It’s not just useful for terrorism. It’s drug trafficking, money laundering, a variety of frauds, not to mention domestic crimes.”

Continue reading

U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel Now Admits Ownership In Voting Company (ES&S)

U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel Now Admits Ownership In Voting Machine Company – Senate Ethics Committee Director Resigns

On October, 10, 2002 Bev Harris, author of the upcoming “Black Box Voting: Ballot-Tampering” in the 21st Century, revealed that Republican Senator Chuck Hagel has ties to the largest voting machine company, Election Systems & Software (ES&S). She reported that he was an owner, Chairman and CEO of Election Systems & Software (called American Information Systems until name change filed in 1997). ES&S was the ONLY company whose machines counted Hagel’s votes when he ran for election in 1996 and 2002. The Hill, a Washington D.C. newspaper that covers the U.S. national political scene, confirmed her findings today and uncovered more details.
Hagel’s campaign finance director, Michael McCarthy, now admits that Senator Hagel still owns a beneficial interest in the ES&S parent company, the McCarthy Group. ES&S counts approximately 60 percent of all votes cast in the United States. According to the Omaha World-Herald which is also a beneficial owner of ES&S, Hagel was CEO of American Information Systems, now called ES&S, from November 1993 through June 2, 1994. He was Chairman from July 1992 until March 15 1995. He was required to disclose these positions on his FEC Personal Disclosure statements, but he did not.
Hagel still owns up to $5 million in the ES&S parent company, McCarthy Group. But Hagel’s office, when interviewed by Channel 8 News in Lincoln, Nebraska for the evening news on October 22, 2002, said he had sold his shares before he was elected. His office issued a fact sheet claiming that he had made full disclosure.
Last week, Hagel’s campaign finance director, Michael McCarthy (currently an owner and a director of ES&S) admitted to Alexander Bolton of The Hill that Hagel is still an owner of ES&S parent company, the McCarthy Group, and said that Hagel also had owned shares in AIS Investors Inc., a group of investors in ES&S itself. Yet Hagel did not disclose owning or selling shares in AIS Investors Inc. on his FEC documents, a required disclosure, nor did he disclose that ES&S is an underlying asset of McCarthy Group, in which he lists an investment of up to $5 million in 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001.

Continue reading

Major Conflict Of Interest In Nebraska?

“If You Want To Win An Election, Just Control The Voting Machines”
by Thom Hartmann for CommonDreams,

You’d think in an open democracy that the government – answerable to all its citizens rather than a handful of corporate officers and stockholders – would program, repair, and control the voting machines. You’d think the computers that handle our cherished ballots would be open and their software and programming available for public scrutiny. You’d think there would be a paper trail of the vote, which could be followed and audited if a there was evidence of voting fraud or if exit polls disagreed with computerized vote counts.
You’d be wrong.
The respected Washington, DC publication The Hill (www.thehill.com/news/012903/hagel.aspx) has confirmed that former conservative radio talk-show host and now Republican U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel was the head of, and continues to own part interest in, the company that owns the company that installed, programmed, and largely ran the voting machines that were used by most of the citizens of Nebraska.

Continue reading