I think Tom Ammiano is the best choice for the next mayor of San Francisco.
I’m providing some clips of him from the debate to give you a better idea about who he is and where he stands on the issues.


This clip is from the Mayoral Debate that aired on KPIX Channel 5 on Tuesday, October 14, 2003.

Tom Ammiano On Allocating Funds To Defend Tenants From Unfair Evictions (Small – 4 MB)
Question from Hank Plante:
Plante: “Supervisor Ammiano. You and I have talked about the fact that you support using public funds for lawyers to defend tenants in some wrongful eviction cases. There was a letter to the editor in the Chronicle this week that says “well, does Ammiano also have a plan to provide lawyers to the landlords who are abused by publicly-funded lawyers?”
Ammiano: “Who wrote that letter? Was that you Hank? You know, Supervisor Yee, some years ago, did introduce legislation that would provide eviction assistance to landlords who felt that they were victimized by tenants and that passed. We all voted for that. The issue of supplying community groups for defense of unjust evictions has precedence in New York, has precedence actually here in San Francisco. So, you know, as long as there’s balance, I don’t see anything wrong with that. And I also think, when we do contract with community groups or non-profits, we do ask them to provide services that ordinarily the city cannot provide. I don’t see a balanced approach being a wrong approach in this case. I do think there are people, landlords, small landlords particularly, you have to distinguish between small landlords and ones like Leona Helmsley, and tenants who do not have the wherewithall to take legal action when they’re facing an unjust eviction. So, I don’t have a problem with that, and I also don’t think that means an either or situation, as the letter writer was advocating.

I think Tom Ammiano is the best choice for the next mayor of San Francisco.
I’m providing some clips of him from the debate to give you a better idea about who he is and where he stands on the issues. (Complete transcript available below.)
Below: Tom holding up his Muni Fast Pass


This clip is from the Mayoral Debate that aired on KPIX Channel 5 on Tuesday, October 14, 2003.

Tom Ammiano On Parking vs. Public Transit (Small – 6 MB)
Question from Rachel Gordon:
Gordon: “Supervisor Ammiano. You’ve been a solid supporter of the city’s “Transit First” policy, but there are a lot of people who live in San Francisco, who visit the city, who have stores in the city, that say “There’s just not enough parking.” It’s really a maddening situation for a lot of folks. Number one: Do you think that there’s a parking problem in San Francisco? And if you do, how should that problem be addressed?”
Ammiano: (Holds up his Muni Fast Pass high, and then puts it back in his pocket.)
“I think there is a parking problem in San Francisco, and I think we need to revisit some of the issues. You know, depending on what part of the city you live in, the parking takes on a different complexion. If you’re in a part of the city that is not served by public transit as often as the Downtown area, then you’re gonna rely on parking more. And we need to look at that and try to change that. If you’re in a part of the city that has a lot of public transit, but somehow it’s not reliable enough, or perceived to be not safe enough, then you need to put monies into that. I think it’s also a regional issue among the metropolitan transportation commission, and I really lobbied hard for more money for Muni. Muni has a 730-750,000 ridership. I think it deserves more money from regional bodies. At the same time, we need to look at what might convince people to leave their cars. And that would be alternative transportation, such as high speed rail, which is going to be coming to San Francisco we hope next year. Looking at what we can do in terms of bicycle lanes, alternative ways of getting people to and from, and also, I think the dedicated funding to Muni is starting to show improvements, but I think that more improvement is needed. And when that happens, we may in fact be able to reduce that reliance on whether or not there’s a parking space or not.
Gordon: “Can I ask just a quick follow-up question? Would you support the construction of parking garages or parking lots in neighborhood commercial corridors, if that’s what the residents and the merchants demanded? Like the inner Sunset, or Northbeach, or the Richmond District?”
Ammiano: “It’s not my druthers. But believe me, and you know, if you looked at the whole equation and there wasn’t that kind of reliable public transit. If they wanted some combination of retail, car share in-fill on top of the parking lot with affordable housing or senior housing, it might take the sting out of it for me. But I would rather work primarily on providing alternatives to that. But, obviously, that should be on the table, because I know it is important to people.”

I think Tom Ammiano is the best choice for the next mayor of San Francisco.
I’m providing some clips of him from the debate to give you a better idea about who he is and where he stands on the issues. (Complete transcript available below.)


This clip is from the Mayoral Debate that aired on KPIX Channel 5 on Tuesday, October 14, 2003.

Tom Ammiano On “Care Not Cash” (Small – 6 MB)
Question from Barbara Taylor:
Taylor: “Supervisor Ammiano. Voters, as you well know, passed “Care Not Cash” by a fairly substantial margin. But you opposed its implementation at the Board. As Mayor, would you continue to ignore the wishes of the voters if you don’t agree with them?”
Ammiano: “I think that we did honor the wishes of the voter by voting on the “Real Care, Real Services” proposition, or I guess I should say “resolution,” passed by the Board at the behest of Supervisor Daly and Ma. We did change the fact that we were saying, not “shelter,” but real “housing.” And the Mayor signed off on it. So, in my mind, we did honor the will of the voter. And then I think there’s a bigger question here too: what was the will of the voter, aside from the very specifics of “Care Not Cash,” and that was to provide solutions, which are housing and services. I have worked through the Department of Public Health to get a grant for six million dollars from HUD, working with the Mayor’s office, about providing that supportive housing, and that’s going to start immediately. And I think that does also honor the will of the voters.
So, while I did oppose “Care Not Cash” in its conception on the ballot, and then the judicial system thought we shouldn’t do it, and then our Budget Analyst thought we shouldn’t do it — we still went ahead and did endorse the will of the voters. And we had to make some compromises about that and that’s what this situation’s all about.”
Taylor: “Some might call that just political spin. The real question is: What’s your view of when voters pass something? Do you feel that you have an ob(?) that’s just advisory in nature? Or that you can put whatever your interpretation might be on the situation and act accordingly?”
Ammiano: “It’s not so much my interpretation, but I do think that certainly, primary to me, is honoring what the voters want. And that doesn’t just happen out of context. They might want something that’s illegal, which is what the judiciary decided. They might want something that really can’t happen because they weren’t given the full information, as the Budget Analyst has said. So, you know, in honoring the will of the voters, you want to be there for them, and then you also want to take those other things into consideration. Spin or not spin, it’s all about solutions. And “Care Not Cash” did have some deficiencies that I think we’ve taken care of.”

I think Tom Ammiano is the best choice for the next mayor of San Francisco.
I’m providing some clips of him from the debate to give you a better idea about who he is and where he stands on the issues. (Complete transcript available below.)


This clip is from the Mayoral Debate that aired on KPIX Channel 5 on Tuesday, October 14, 2003.

Tom Ammiano On Whether He’s Become A “Moderate” (Small – 4 MB)
Question from Hank Plante, CBS Channel 5 Political Editor:
Plante: “Supervisor, Good Evening.”
Ammiano: “Good Evening.”
Plante: “You’ve lost the earring. You’re wearing better suits. We no longer hear you talking about taxing the rich or every stock transaction in the City, as you once did. My question might be obvious to you. Have you moved to the center for political expediency?”
Ammiano: “I think that you can redefine what “the center” is. I remember Diane Feinstein in the early days of her administration, had some very social justice positive positions — still defined as a “moderate.” If she was in Nebraska, she would have been a “Trotsky-ite.” So I think there’s a perception of relativity there about that. I’m still the same guy I’ve always been. Certainly I’ve been in office a long enough time to understand that bringing people together can stop some of the dysfunctions that happen here in San Francisco. Whether it’s landlords or tenants, or whether it’s the environmentalists vs. Muni, or whether it’s AIDS activists vs. Kaiser. I don’t know if that’s “the center” or not, but I see a wisdom in that, that a mayor needs to have. So, I can’t give you a definitive “yes” or “no.” I think that “centerness” depends on the eye of the beholder. I think I’m a more “centered” person. Whether I’m in the center of the political spectrum or not, I can’t tell you. But I will tell you, I’m still as honest as I’ve always been and as hard working as I’ve always been, and that will never change.