Paul Krugman In The NY Times On The Dangers Of Electronic Voting Without A Paper Trail


Hack the Vote

By Paul Krugman for the NY Times.

Inviting Bush supporters to a fund-raiser, the host wrote, “I am committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year.” No surprise there. But Walden O’Dell — who says that he wasn’t talking about his business operations — happens to be the chief executive of Diebold Inc., whose touch-screen voting machines are in increasingly widespread use across the United States.
For example, Georgia — where Republicans scored spectacular upset victories in the 2002 midterm elections — relies exclusively on Diebold machines. To be clear, though there were many anomalies in that 2002 vote, there is no evidence that the machines miscounted. But there is also no evidence that the machines counted correctly. You see, Diebold machines leave no paper trail…
What we do know about Diebold does not inspire confidence. The details are technical, but they add up to a picture of a company that was, at the very least, extremely sloppy about security, and may have been trying to cover up product defects.

Continue reading

FCC OK’s Rupert Murdoch’s Purchase of DirecTV


FCC Approves Murdoch Purchase of DirecTV

By Frank Ahrens for the Washington Post.

The Federal Communications Commission and Justice Department today approved News Corporation Inc.’s purchase of Hughes Electronics Corp.’s DirecTV home satellite system, giving Rupert Murdoch the crucial missing piece of his global satellite empire.
By a vote of 3-2, the FCC commissioners allowed the $6.5 billion cash-and-stock purchase to go ahead with a number of conditions meant to keep News Corp. from using DirecTV as a lever to raise programming prices to rival cable and satellite companies. The merger gives News Corp. a controlling 34 percent interest in Hughes.
News Corp. is the parent company of the Fox television network, Fox News Channel, FX and Fox Sports regional cable channels. Opponents of the merger feared that News Corp. would raise its programming prices to cable rivals, such as Comcast Corp., or threaten to pull Fox programming in order to drive customers away from cable and to DirecTV.
The FCC ruled that the merger would improve service to DirecTV customers — News Corp. has a history of adding channels and features, such as interactivity, to its other satellite systems — would create a more muscular competitor to the cable industry, which has monopolies in most markets, and promote the agency’s goal of localism, by requiring News Corp. to add local channels to the DirecTV system.
FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell joined fellow Republican commissioners Kevin J. Martin and Kathleen Q. Abernathy in approving the deal.
Dissenting were Democratic FCC commissioners Michael J. Copps and Jonathan S. Adelstein. The commission has been split along party lines on media issues since the rancorous June vote adopting new media ownership rules.

Continue reading

RIAA Hires ATF Director To Head Its Anti-Piracy Efforts

The RIAA has hired the Nation’s top hired gun to fight music piracy.
Apparently, the recording industry doesn’t realize yet that it’s fighting a losing battle. Looks like we’re in for another ridiculous fight this coming year.

ATF Director to Head Music Industry’s Anti-Piracy Efforts

By the Associated Press for Fox News.

The director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and
Explosives (search) is leaving his post next month to lead the recording
industry’s efforts to stop music piracy.
Bradley A. Buckles, who served ATF for 30 years and was named director in
1999, will come head of the Anti-Piracy Unit of the Recording Industry
Association of America (search), the trade group announced Tuesday.
“Brad’s appointment should signal to everyone that we continue to take
piracy (search), here and throughout the world, very seriously,” said Mitch Bainwol, RIAA’s chairman and chief executive officer.

Continue reading

More On The Shrub’s Attempt To Cover Up His Ever-changing Story About The Cost Of The War By Removing Web-based Evidence Of His Administration’s Lies

The Shrub is trying to cover his tracks by deleting hundreds of damning documents from the Internet. Nice try shrubby, but the built-in redundancy of the Web will hopefully save the day on this one.

White House Covers Tracks by Removing Information

In a high-tech cover-up, the Washington Post this morning reports the White House is actively scrubbing government websites clean of any of its own previous statements that have now proven to be untrue.1 Specifically, on April 23, 2003, the president sent his top international aid official on national television to reassure the public that the cost of war and reconstruction in Iraq would be modest. USAID Director Andrew Natsios, echoing other Administration officials, told Nightline that, “In terms of the American taxpayers contribution, [$1.7 billion] is it for the US. The American part of this will be $1.7 billion. We have no plans for any further-on funding for this.”
The president has requested more than $166 billion in funding for the war and reconstruction efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan this year. But instead of admitting that he misled the nation about the cost of war, the president has allowed the State Department “to purge the comments by Natsios from the State Department’s Web site. The transcript, and links to it, have vanished.” (The link where the transcript existed until it caused embarrassment was http://www.usaid.gov/iraq/nightline_042403_t.html).

Continue reading

Shrub Attempts To Alter History By Removing Web Documents


White House Web Scrubbing

Offending Comments on Iraq Disappear From Site
By Dana Milbank for the Washington Post.

White House officials were steamed when Andrew S. Natsios, the administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development, said earlier this year that U.S. taxpayers would not have to pay more than $1.7 billion to reconstruct Iraq — which turned out to be a gross understatement of the tens of billions of dollars the government now expects to spend.
Recently, however, the government has purged the offending comments by Natsios from the agency’s Web site. The transcript, and links to it, have vanished.
This is not the first time the administration has done some creative editing of government Web sites. After the insurrection in Iraq proved more stubborn than expected, the White House edited the original headline on its Web site of President Bush’s May 1 speech, “President Bush Announces Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended,” to insert the word “Major” before combat.
Since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, administration Web sites have been scrubbed for anything vaguely sensitive, and passwords are now required to access even much unclassified information. Though it is not clear whether the White House is directing the changes, several agencies have been following a similar pattern. The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and USAID have removed or revised fact sheets on condoms, excising information about their effectiveness in disease prevention, and promoting abstinence instead. The National Cancer Institute, meanwhile, scrapped claims on its Web site that there was no association between abortion and breast cancer. And the Justice Department recently redacted criticism of the department in a consultant’s report that had been posted on its Web site.

Continue reading

I’m Back!

So obviously, I’m back to blogging again. I’m actually not done completely with all of my school projects, but I feel good enough about completing them shortly that I’ve decided to treat myself to blogging again.
I can’t tell you how good it feels to be back on the case. I really missed blogging and being part of our little community. Thanks for being patient and hanging around ’till I came back. I can tell you’ve been hanging around because my numbers didn’t go down any the whole time I was gone. (Go figure:)
The first thing I’m going to do is catch up on some old stuff. I’m kinda hanging around with relatives doing the holiday thing, so I should have plenty of time to catch up. I didn’t think I’d have any connectivity over the holidays, but I was wrong!
So anyway, there’s my long winded way of saying that I’m glad to be back, and I love you guys!
Peace!

John Perry Barlow Has A Blog!

John Perry Barlow has started a blog.
‘Bout time! Thanks John Perry!

I’ve been wary of blogs. Starting a blog looks a little like signing up for treadmill duty. Unless you like to write better than I do – and, personally, I’d rather pump septic tanks – consigning yourself to writing something every day looks like voluntary servitude. Furthermore, when I read some of the discussions on blogs, it looked a little like what you’d get if you invited all of your most socially dysfunctional friends into your living room and gave them plenty of beer.
But then – duh – it dawned on me that I’m under no obligation to post every day. I can continue to write BarlowSpams with my usual infrequency and post them to the blog in addition to sending them directly to you. And there we can discuss them together.
As to the civility of those discussions, there is no reason to think you are as inclined to flame at one another as other blog-posters appear to be. You’re a sweet and relatively civilized lot. I’ve never had to break up a fight at a BarlowFrenzy. Why should I worry about it here? (Actually, there was that party in New York years ago where the anarchists from the Lower East Side went to war with the Italian soccer contingent and they all started throwing hummus at one another, but that seemed unusual….)
Having settled these concerns in my mind, I still didn’t start blogging. There remained the simple matter of inertia and technological surface tension. I knew it couldn’t be that hard to put up a blog. Over a million others have already done it. But I had a hard time getting myself to believe it when I’d tell myself, “This afternoon you should get your blog going, Barlow.”
This is one of the things friends are for. Then, a few days ago, I fell into the too-rare company of my dear pal, Joi Ito, who is like the Blogdom equivalent of Zeus. (Check him out at http://joi.ito.com/.) He sat me down in the lobby of San Francisco’s snotty W Hotel – where there is at least free WiFi coverage – and within a few minutes I had a blog.

Continue reading

Wired On Howard Dean’s Internet Strategy

A nice little piece that tells us a lot of what we already know about Howard Dean’s Internet-savvy campaign. I’ll never get tired of reading about it 🙂

How the Internet Invented Howard Dean

Forget fundraising (though his opponents sure can’t). The real reason the Doctor is in: He listens to the technology – and the people who use it.
By Gary Wolf for Wired.

Neither policy nor pragmatism alone drove MoveOn to Dean; his key advantage was that his bloggers were already deeply interlinked with bloggers friendly to MoveOn. Dean’s network made it easy for his supporters to vote in the MoveOn poll, while offering MoveOn members an opportunity to influence the Democratic race, even if their own state’s primary was irrelevant. Participation, not policy, was key.
Joi Ito, founder of Neoteny, a venture firm, and former chair of Infoseek Japan, has joined a group of technologists advising Dean (others include Ross Mayfield, Clay Shirky, and Lawrence Lessig, also a regular contributor to Wired). After looking at a paper Ito and some of his colleagues have been working on called “Emergent Democracy,” I contact him to ask if he thinks there’s a difference between an emergent leader and an old-fashioned political opportunist. What does it take to lead a smart mob? Ito emails back an odd metaphor: “You’re not a leader, you’re a place. You’re like a park or a garden. If it’s comfortable and cool, people are attracted. Deanspace is not really about Dean. It’s about us.”

Continue reading

More On Real Details Of Saddam Capture

I’m in a hurry so I’ll just have to give you the links:

Saddam was captured by Kurds, not US


We got him: Kurds say they caught Saddam


US Saddam claims being challenged

They’ve got a good reason for not telling the truth (right on schedule!) — they feared an Arab-Kurd conflict…
There are also more details about his ex-wife turning him in, and how he was captured (his cook spiked his food).
Enjoy!
Happy Holidays everyone!

Continue reading

Home Movies From Creative Commons Party – Craig Newmark, Willem Dakota Lessig and Friends

This is footage of Craig Newmark playing with Lawrence Lessig’s son, Willem, while in the arms of Justin Hall. (As filmed by me.)
Hey these aren’t prepared to stream over the Internet – you’ll have to download them to your hard drive!
The “complete” version also has some shots of the party.
This footage was pretty dark so I had to lighten it in Premiere to make it watchable.
Highlights include Craig flapping his arms like a chicken (part 1)!!

Craig and Willem 1 of 2
(Small – 9 MB)

Craig and Willem 2 of 2
(Small – 9 MB)

Craig and Willem and Party – Complete Clip
(Small – 32 MB)

Slightly higher res version of same clip
(Small – 44 MB)