home > archives > Michael Moore
November 14, 2004
Michael Moore's Video Crew's Documentary Of Disenfranchised Voters In Cleveland, Ohio

And there are A LOT of them.

In a nutshell, a lot of voters in the poorer and minority areas were turned away for a variety of unfair reasons. The film documents these cases of disenfranchisement.

This was produced by Michael Moore's "Video The Vote" crew in Cleveland.


Video The Vote
(59 MB)

Here's a link to Xeni's
Boing Boing Post and a bunch of Mirrors

The producers of this (and the editor, Dave Pentecost) wanted me to mention the following:

1)
People for the American Way
and
Election Protection

2) Their apologies to The Jayhawks for not clearing the music first. (They are still waiting to hear back, their rights person is in transit) but they felt that it is really a free music video for the group!

3) This was shot by a dedicated group of 20 volunteer filmmakers, but any mistakes in the editing or focus of this video are Dave Pentecost's fault.
(Aww Dave, I didn't see any errors :-)

4) The organizers of the trip will release a longer selection of statements by voters who had problems voting. (Probably on Monday, November 15, 2004)

This goes with this earlier post.

I've had this since November 5, 2004, so I guess that's the publishing date. You've probably seen it around already, but I promised I would host it here so...better late than never :-)

Posted by Lisa at 10:01 AM
November 02, 2004
Report From Michael Moore's "Protect The Vote" Video Crew

This in from Dave Pentecost of Michael Moore's "Protect the Vote" video team in Cleveland. (I offered to host clips for them.):


I am with the Michael Moore protect the vote video team in Cleveland. I expect we will have clips of voters being challenged or sound bites after they leave the polls.

We are starting to hear about more incidents of challengers and dirty tricks and are sending crews to those locations. I'll let you know when I've uploaded anything.

This is typical right now: we got a report that there were 5
challengers where they are only allowed 2, old couples being allowed
only one vote between them, cops around and telling our crews to turn
off the cameras (even though they were the proper distance). Rebecca
Perl who is organizing things called for a lawyer, he went over and
got the challengers to leave. I'll see what gets on tape, but that's
what we are here for - rapid response.

I shot the Michael Moore press conference this afternoon. He's good
but you can see him on TV. I'm still looking for the clips you can't
see elsewhere. And after the presser, the "real" media went off
trailing behind our teams, who've been out in the rain all day.

Just got a call that they are sending some tapes back. We'll see what's up.

And then later:


Looks like no video clip today. some good
anecdotal interviews. Good determined folks at the polls. Surprisingly
little conflict considering all the waiting lines. But we know how
great all Americans are!

Posted by Lisa at 04:49 PM
July 04, 2004
The Daily Show On Farenheit 911

This is from the June 28, 2004 program.


The Daily Show On Farenheit 911


The Daily Show
(The best news on television.)

Posted by Lisa at 08:55 PM
Michael Moore On The Daily Show

This is from the June 24, 2004 program.


Michael Moore On The Daily Show


The Daily Show
(The best news on television.)

Posted by Lisa at 08:49 PM
December 21, 2003
Michael Moore Posts Letters From The Troops

I'll be posting some stuff today...(even though technically I don't have time to.)

Some of this stuff is just too important...(Ugh...that's how I got behind in my school work to begin with!)


Letters the Troops Have Sent Me


As we approach the holidays, I've been thinking a lot about our kids who are in the armed forces serving in Iraq. I've received hundreds of letters from our troops in Iraq -- and they are telling me something very different from what we are seeing on the evening news.

What they are saying to me, often eloquently and in heart-wrenching words, is that they were lied to -- and this war has nothing to do with the security of the United States of America.

I've written back and spoken on the phone to many of them and I've asked a few of them if it would be OK if I posted their letters on my website and they've said yes. They do so at great personal risk (as they may face disciplinary measures for exercising their right to free speech). I thank them for their bravery.

Lance Corporal George Batton of the United States Marine Corps, who returned from Iraq in September (after serving in MP company Alpha), writes the following:

"You'd be surprised at how many of the guys I talked to in my company and others believed that the president's scare about Saddam's WMD was a bunch of bullshit and that the real motivation for this war was only about money. There was also a lot of crap that many companies, not just marine companies, had to go through with not getting enough equipment to fulfill their missions when they crossed the border. It was a miracle that our company did what it did the two months it was staying in Iraq during the war…. We were promised to go home on June 8th, and found out that it was a lie and we got stuck doing missions for an extra three months. Even some of the most radical conservatives in our company including our company gunnery sergeant got a real bad taste in their mouth about the Marine corps, and maybe even president Bush."

Here is the full text of the article in case the link goes bad:

http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/122103A.shtml

Letters the Troops Have Sent Me
By Michael Moore
MichaelMoore.com

Friday 19 December 2003

Dear Friends,

As we approach the holidays, I've been thinking a lot about our kids who are in the armed forces serving in Iraq. I've received hundreds of letters from our troops in Iraq -- and they are telling me something very different from what we are seeing on the evening news.

What they are saying to me, often eloquently and in heart-wrenching words, is that they were lied to -- and this war has nothing to do with the security of the United States of America.

I've written back and spoken on the phone to many of them and I've asked a few of them if it would be OK if I posted their letters on my website and they've said yes. They do so at great personal risk (as they may face disciplinary measures for exercising their right to free speech). I thank them for their bravery.

Lance Corporal George Batton of the United States Marine Corps, who returned from Iraq in September (after serving in MP company Alpha), writes the following:

"You'd be surprised at how many of the guys I talked to in my company and others believed that the president's scare about Saddam's WMD was a bunch of bullshit and that the real motivation for this war was only about money. There was also a lot of crap that many companies, not just marine companies, had to go through with not getting enough equipment to fulfill their missions when they crossed the border. It was a miracle that our company did what it did the two months it was staying in Iraq during the war…. We were promised to go home on June 8th, and found out that it was a lie and we got stuck doing missions for an extra three months. Even some of the most radical conservatives in our company including our company gunnery sergeant got a real bad taste in their mouth about the Marine corps, and maybe even president Bush."

Here's what Specialist Mike Prysner of the U.S. Army wrote to me:

"Dear Mike -- I’m writing this without knowing if it’ll ever get to you... I’m writing it from the trenches of a war (that’s still going on,) not knowing why I’m here or when I’m leaving. I’ve toppled statues and vandalized portraits, while wearing an American flag on my sleeve, and struggling to learn how to understand... I joined the army as soon as I was eligible – turned down a writing scholarship to a state university, eager to serve my country, ready to die for the ideals I fell in love with. Two years later I found myself moments away from a landing onto a pitch black airstrip, ready to charge into a country I didn't believe I belonged in, with your words (from the Oscars) repeating in my head. My time in Iraq has always involved finding things to convince myself that I can be proud of my actions; that I was a part of something just. But no matter what pro-war argument I came up with, I pictured my smirking commander-in-chief, thinking he was fooling a nation..."

An Army private, still in Iraq and wishing to remain anonymous, writes:

"I would like to tell you how difficult it is to serve under a man who was never elected. Because he is the president and my boss, I have to be very careful as to who and what i say about him. This also concerns me a great deal... to limit the military's voice is to limit exactly what America stands for... and the greater percentage of us feel completely underpowered. He continually sets my friends, my family, and several others in a kind of danger that frightens me beyond belief. I know several other soldiers who feel the same way and discuss the situation with me on a regular basis."

Jerry Oliver of the U.S. Army, who has just returned from Baghdad, writes:

"I have just returned home from "Operation Iraqi Freedom". I spent 5 months in Baghdad, and a total of 3 years in the U.S. Army. I was recently discharged with Honorable valor and returned to the States only to be horrified by what I've seen my country turn into. I'm now 22 years old and have discovered America is such a complicated place to live, and moreover, Americans are almost oblivious to what's been happening to their country. America has become "1984." Homeland security is teaching us to spy on one another and forcing us to become anti-social. Americans are willingly sacrificing our freedoms in the name of security, the same Freedoms I was willing to put my life on the line for. The constitution is in jeopardy. As Gen. Tommy Franks said, (broken down of course) One more terrorist attack and the constitution will hold no meaning."

And a Specialist in the U.S. Army wrote to me this week about the capture of Saddam Hussein:

"Wow, 130,000 troops on the ground, nearly 500 deaths and over a billion dollars a day, but they caught a guy living in a hole. Am I supposed to be dazzled?"

There are lots more of these, straight from the soldiers who have been on the front lines and have seen first hand what this war is really about.

I have also heard from their friends and relatives, and from other veterans. A mother writing on behalf of her son (whose name we have withheld) wrote:

"My son said that this is the worst it's been since the "end" of the war. He said the troops have been given new rules of engagement, and that they are to "take out" any persons who aggress on the Americans, even if it results in "collateral" damage. Unfortunately, he did have to kill someone in self defense and was told by his commanding officer ‘Good kill.’

"My son replied ‘You just don't get it, do you?’

"Here we are...Vietnam all over again."

From a 56 year old Navy veteran, relating a conversation he had with a young man who was leaving for Iraq the next morning:

"What disturbed me most was when I asked him what weapons he carried as a truck driver. He told me the new M-16, model blah blah blah, stuff never made sense to me even when I was in. I asked him what kind of side arm they gave him and his fellow drivers. He explained, "Sir, Reservists are not issued side arms or flack vests as there was not enough money to outfit all the Reservists, only Active Personnel". I was appalled to say the least.

"Bush is a jerk agreed, but I can't believe he is this big an Asshole not providing protection and arms for our troops to fight HIS WAR!"

From a 40-year old veteran of the Marine Corps:

"Why is it that we are forever waving the flag of sovereignty, EXCEPT when it concerns our financial interests in other sovereign states? What gives us the right to tell anyone else how they should govern themselves, and live their lives? Why can't we just lead the world by example? I mean no wonder the world hates us, who do they get to see? Young assholes in uniforms with guns, and rich, old, white tourists! Christ, could we put up a worse first impression?"

(To read more from my Iraq mailbag -- and to read these above letters in full -- go to my website: http://www.michaelmoore.com/books-films/dudewheresmycountry/soldierletters/index.php)

Remember back in March, once the war had started, how risky it was to make any anti-war comments to people you knew at work or school or, um, at awards ceremonies? One thing was for sure -- if you said anything against the war, you had BETTER follow it up immediately with this line: "BUT I SUPPORT THE TROOPS!" Failing to do that meant that you were not only unpatriotic and un-American, your dissent meant that YOU were putting our kids in danger, that YOU might be the reason they lose their lives. Dissent was only marginally tolerated IF you pledged your "support" for our soldiers.

Of course, you needed to do no such thing. Why? Because people like you have ALWAYS supported "the troops." Who are these troops? They are our poor, our working class. Most of them enlisted because it was about the only place to get a job or receive the guarantee of a college education. You, my good friends, have ALWAYS, through your good works, your contributions, your activism, your votes, SUPPORTED these very kids who come from the other side of the tracks. You NEVER need to be defensive when it comes to your "support" for the "troops" -- you are the only ones who have ALWAYS been there for them.

It is Mr. Bush and his filthy rich cronies -- whose sons and daughters will NEVER see a day in a uniform -- they are the ones who do NOT support our troops. Our soldiers joined the military and, in doing so, offered to give THEIR LIVES for US if need be. What a tremendous gift that is -- to be willing to die so that you and I don't have to! To be willing to shed their blood so that we may be free. To serve in our place, so that WE don't have to serve. What a tremendous act of selflessness and generosity! Here they are, these 18, 19, and 20-year olds, most of whom have had to suffer under an unjust economic system that is set up NOT to benefit THEM -- these kids who have lived their first 18 years in the worst parts of town, going to the most miserable schools, living in danger and learning often to go without, watching their parents struggle to get by and then be humiliated by a system that is always looking to make life harder for them by cutting their benefits, their education, their libraries, their fire and police, their future.

And then, after this miserable treatment, these young men and women, instead of coming after US to demand a more just society, they go and join the army to DEFEND us and our way of life! It boggles the mind, doesn't it? They not only deserve our thanks, they deserve a big piece of the pie that we dine on, those of us who never have to worry about taking a bullet while we fret over which Palm Pilot to buy the nephew for Christmas.

In fact, all that these kids in the army ask for in return from us is our promise that we never send them into harm's way unless it is for the DEFENSE of our nation, to protect us from being killed by "the enemy."

And that promise, my friends, has been broken. It has been broken in the worst way imaginable. We have sent them into war NOT to defend us, not to protect us, not to spare the slaughter of innocents or allies. We have sent them to war so Bush and Company can control the second largest supply of oil in the world. We have sent them into war so that the Vice President's company can bilk the government for billions of dollars. We have sent them into war based on a lie of weapons of mass destruction and the lie that Saddam helped plan 9-11 with Osama bin Laden.

By doing all of this, Mr. Bush has proven that it is HE who does not support our troops. It is HE who has put their lives in danger, and it is HE who is responsible for the nearly 500 American kids who have now died for NO honest, decent reason whatsoever.

The letters I've received from the friends and relatives of our kids over there make it clear that they are sick of this war and they are scared to death that they may never see their loved ones again. It breaks my heart to read these letters. I wish there was something I could do. I wish there was something we all could do.

Maybe there is. As Christmas approaches (and Hanukkah begins tonight), I would like to suggest a few things each of us could do to make the holidays a bit brighter -- if not safer -- for our troops and their families back home.

1. Many families of soldiers are hurting financially, especially those families of reservists and National Guard who are gone from the full-time jobs ("just one weekend a month and we'll pay for your college education!"). You can help them by contacting the Armed Forces Emergency Relief Funds at http://www.afrtrust.org/ (ignore the rah-rah military stuff and remember that this is money that will help out these families who are living in near-poverty). Each branch has their own relief fund, and the money goes to help the soldiers and families with paying for food and rent, medical and dental expenses, personal needs when pay is delayed, and funeral expenses. You can find more ways to support the troops, from buying groceries for their families to donating your airline miles so they can get home for a visit, by going here.
2. Thousands of Iraqi civilians have been killed by our bombs and indiscriminate shooting. We must help protect them and their survivors. You can do so by supporting the Quakers' drive to provide infant care kits to Iraqi hospitals-find out more here: http://www.afsc.org/iraq/relief/default.shtm. You can also help the people of Iraq by supporting the Iraqi Red Crescent Society-here’s how to contact them: http://www.ifrc.org/address/iq.asp, or you can make an online donation through the International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies by going here: http://www.ifrc.org/HELPNOW/donate/donate_iraq.asp.
3. With 130,000 American men and women currently in Iraq, every community in this country has either sent someone to fight in this war or is home to family members of someone fighting in this war. Organize care packages through your local community groups, activist groups, and churches and send them to these young men and women. The military no longer accepts packages addressed to "Any Soldier," so you’ll have to get their names first. Figure out who you can help from your area, and send them books, CDs, games, footballs, gloves, blankets-anything that may make their extended (and extended and extended...) stay in Iraq a little brighter and more comfortable. You can also sponsor care packages to American troops through the USO: http://www.usocares.org/.
4. Want to send a soldier a free book or movie? I’ll start by making mine available for free to any soldier serving in Iraq. Just send me their name and address in Iraq (or, if they have already left Iraq, where they are now) and the first thousand emails I get at soldiers@michaelmoore.com will receive a free copy of "Dude..." or a free "Bowling..." DVD.
5. Finally, we all have to redouble our efforts to end this war and bring the troops home. That's the best gift we could give them -- get them out of harm's way ASAP and insist that the U.S. go back to the UN and have them take over the rebuilding of Iraq (with the US and Britain funding it, because, well, we have to pay for our mess). Get involved with your local peace group-you can find one near where you live by visiting United for Peace, at: http://www.unitedforpeace.org and the Vietnam Veterans Against War: http://www.vvaw.org/contact/. A large demonstration is being planned for March 20, check here for more details: http://www.unitedforpeace.org/article.php?id=2136. To get a "Bring Them Home Now" bumper sticker or a poster for your yard, go here: http://bringthemhomenow.org/yellowribbon_graphics/index.html. Also, back only anti-war candidates for Congress and President (Kucinich, Dean, Clark, Sharpton).

I know it feels hopeless. That's how they want us to feel. Don't give up. We owe it to these kids, the troops WE SUPPORT, to get them the hell outta there and back home so they can help organize the drive to remove the war profiteers from office next November.

To all who serve in our armed forces, to their parents and spouses and loved ones, we offer to you the regrets of millions and the promise that we will right this wrong and do whatever we can to thank you for offering to risk your lives for us. That your life was put at risk for Bush's greed is a disgrace and a travesty, the likes of which I have not seen in my lifetime.

Please be safe, come home soon, and know that our thoughts and prayers are with you during this season when many of us celebrate the birth of the prince of "peace."

Yours,
Michael Moore
mmflint@aol.com
www.michaelmoore.com

Posted by Lisa at 07:40 AM
November 06, 2003
Nice Interface To All The Michael Moore Media You Could Ever Want

But is there ever really enough?

This was worth hosting for sure. It's footage like this that makes a library grand.


Unofficial Michael Moore Media

Posted by Lisa at 06:14 PM
October 22, 2003
A Secondhand Account Of Michael Moore's SFSU Presentation

A fellow student of mine went to Michael Moore's presentation here at San Francisco State Monday night, and she filled me in a bit on some of the events that took place.

There were about 4,000 people in the gym and at least another 1,000 outside that couldn't get in. Michael was late starting the show inside because he took some time to talk to the folks outside first.

Michael put on a little quiz show routine where he invited a Canadian (supposedly with a low GPA) and several Americans (supposedly with high GPAs) down from the audience to participate. He asked the Canadian questions about the United States (who's the President and some basic geography questions, etc.) and then some geography questions about other parts of the world like Iraq and Afghanistan. The Canadian got everything right. He then asked the high gpa American students about Canada and the same geography questions about Iraq and Afghanistan -- none of which they could answer correctly.

He went on to cite a few studies of Americans from 18-24 years of age where the subjects didn't seem to know where many other countries in the world were physically located. He made the point that if we were going to be at war with countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq, we should probably know where they are on the map.

At one point, he asked the audience to get together and decide who they'd like him to call up on the telephone while he was there. The audience wanted him to call the President of SFSU, but nobody knew his phone number. So their next choice was mayoral candidate Gavin Newsome. Luckily Mayoral candidate Matt Gonzales was in the audience, and he had Newsome's personal cell phone number handy.

The audience didn't like Newsome, and Michael asked them why. The audience filled Michael in on the "Care Not Cash" situation, which takes General Assistance payments away in exchange for "services," many of which have yet to be completely specified (although the payments would cease immediately).
(A Judge has already thrown this legislation out, by the way, on the grounds that it's illegal to take this money away from people, even if the voters voted it in.)

Michael then called up Newsome and said something along the lines of "I've heard about this 'Care Not Cash' thing and it seems like you don't really care at all." He mentioned the Getty family and said something like "we all know that you're a Republican in Democrat clothing...I'm in front of an audience of thousands of people right now (he then held up the phone so audience could make noise)...hear that? That's a whole lot of votes that are not going to be voting for you, Gavin."

Then he switched his tone of voice to a cheerful one and said "Ok thanks! Have a nice day!"

Posted by Lisa at 07:26 PM
Michael Moore Goodies From Kevin Norton

Kevin Norton donated a truckload of Michael Moore movie clips to my Michael Moore archive.

I haven't even had a chance to look at these yet, but I thought I'd let you know they were up there.

He's also included a ton of
MP3 clips
too! These are named very nicely and include: 1996_radiofreela, 60minutes, after the oscars, bill maher, boulder-CO, an interview in belfast, ralph nader rally, university of toronto, and webzine.

Enjoy!

Posted by Lisa at 09:32 AM
October 20, 2003
Michael Moore In SF Today

Michael Moore is at San Francisco State in the Gym tonight at 7pm.

I'm going to try to make it, but I might not. I've got a ton of blogging and homework to do and my good camera is busted anyway, so it wouldn't come out that good if I filmed it. And it's kind of frustrating for me these days to go to events I can't film. So I'll probably skip it.

I have a feeling I'll get to meet Mike in person someday anyway, if I'm patient (and do my homework, and eat my vegetables :-)

Just wanted to make sure you knew about it.

Posted by Lisa at 08:06 AM
October 02, 2003
Michael Moore On The Lying Liars Who Tell Lies About Him


How to Deal with the Lies and the Lying Liars When They Lie about "Bowling for Columbine"


One thing you get used to when you're in what's called "the public eye" is reading the humorous fiction that others like to write about you. For instance, I have read in quite respectable and trustworthy publications that a) I'm a college graduate (I'm not), b) I was a factory worker (I quit the first day), and c) I have two brothers (I have none). Newsweek wrote that I live in a penthouse on Central Park West (I live above a Baby Gap store, and not on any park), and the Internet Movie Database once listed me as the director of the Elvis movie, "Blue Hawaii" ( I was 6 at the time the film was made, but I was quite skilled in directing my sisters in building me a snowman). Lately, my favorite mistake is the one many reviewers made crediting the cartoon in "Bowling for Columbine" as being the work of the "South Park" creators. It isn't. I wrote it and my buddy Harold Moss's animation studio drew it.

I've enjoyed reading these inventions/mistakes about this "Michael Moore." I mean, who wouldn't want to fantasize about living in penthouses roughhousing with brothers you never had. But lately I've begun to see so many things about me or my work that aren't true. It's become so easy to spread these fictions through the internet (thanks mostly to lazy reporters or web junkies who do all their research by typing in "key words" and then just repeat the same mistakes). And so I wonder that if I don't correct the record, then all of the people who don't know better may just end up being filled with a bunch of stuff that isn't true.

Of course, it would take a lot of my time to contact all these sites and media outlets to correct their errors and I think it's more important I spend my time on my next book or movie so I just let it ride. But is that fair to you, the reader, who has now been told something that isn't true?

With the unexpected and overwhelming success of "Bowling for Columbine" and "Stupid White Men," the fiction that has been written or spoken about me and my work has reached a whole new level of storytelling. It's no longer about making some simple errors or calling me "Roger" Moore. It is now about organized groups going full blast trying to discredit me by knowingly making up lies and repeating them over and over in the hopes that people will believe them – and, then, stop listening to me.

Oh, that it would be so easy!


Here is the full text of the entire article in case the link goes bad:

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/wackoattacko/

How to Deal with the Lies and the Lying Liars When They Lie about "Bowling for Columbine"
by Michael Moore

One thing you get used to when you're in what's called "the public eye" is reading the humorous fiction that others like to write about you. For instance, I have read in quite respectable and trustworthy publications that a) I'm a college graduate (I'm not), b) I was a factory worker (I quit the first day), and c) I have two brothers (I have none). Newsweek wrote that I live in a penthouse on Central Park West (I live above a Baby Gap store, and not on any park), and the Internet Movie Database once listed me as the director of the Elvis movie, "Blue Hawaii" ( I was 6 at the time the film was made, but I was quite skilled in directing my sisters in building me a snowman). Lately, my favorite mistake is the one many reviewers made crediting the cartoon in "Bowling for Columbine" as being the work of the "South Park" creators. It isn't. I wrote it and my buddy Harold Moss's animation studio drew it.

I've enjoyed reading these inventions/mistakes about this "Michael Moore." I mean, who wouldn't want to fantasize about living in penthouses roughhousing with brothers you never had. But lately I've begun to see so many things about me or my work that aren't true. It's become so easy to spread these fictions through the internet (thanks mostly to lazy reporters or web junkies who do all their research by typing in "key words" and then just repeat the same mistakes). And so I wonder that if I don't correct the record, then all of the people who don't know better may just end up being filled with a bunch of stuff that isn't true.

Of course, it would take a lot of my time to contact all these sites and media outlets to correct their errors and I think it's more important I spend my time on my next book or movie so I just let it ride. But is that fair to you, the reader, who has now been told something that isn't true?

With the unexpected and overwhelming success of "Bowling for Columbine" and "Stupid White Men," the fiction that has been written or spoken about me and my work has reached a whole new level of storytelling. It's no longer about making some simple errors or calling me "Roger" Moore. It is now about organized groups going full blast trying to discredit me by knowingly making up lies and repeating them over and over in the hopes that people will believe them – and, then, stop listening to me.

Oh, that it would be so easy!

Fortunately, they are so wound up in their anger and hatred that they have ended up discrediting themselves.

Look, I accept the fact that, if I go after the Thief-in-Chief – and more people buy my book than any other nonfiction book last year – then that is naturally going to send a few of his henchmen after me. Fine. That's okay. I knew that before I got into this and I ain't whining about it now.

I also realize that you just don't go after the NRA and its supporters and then not expect them to come back at you with both barrels (so to speak). These are not nice people and they don't play nice – that's how they got to be so powerful.

So, a whole host of gun lobby groups and individual gun nuts have put up websites where the smears on me range from the pre-adolescent (I'm a "crapweasel," and a "fat fucking piece of shit") to Orwellian-style venom ("Michael Moore hates America!").

I have mostly ignored this silliness. But a few weeks ago, this lunatic crap hit the mainstream fan. CNN actually put some guy on a show saying that my film contains "so many falsehoods, one after the other, after the other, after the other." They introduced him as a "critic" and "research director" of the "Independence Institute." He seemed mighty impressive.

Except they failed to tell their viewers who he really was: a contributing editor of Gun Week Magazine.

CNN saw no need to inform the viewers that their "expert"-- who has made a career out of opposing any form of gun control–has a vested interest in convincing the public that "Bowling for Columbine" is a horribly rotten movie.

So, what do you do when the nutcases succeed in getting on CNN? Do you just keep ignoring them? How do you handle people who say the Holocaust never happened or that monkeys fly? Ignore them and they'll go away? If you give them any attention, all the nuts will come out of the woodwork.

And that's what happened. I saw another one of these lunatics, this time on MSNBC. A guy named John Lofton. He went on and on about how my movie is all made up. The anchor on MSNBC never challenged him on his lies and never told the viewers who he really was – a right wing crazy who believes Bush is too liberal. He was once an advisor to Pat Buchanan's Presidential campaign, and was a direct-mail writer for Jesse Helms. Writing in opposition to Hate Crime bills in the conservative Washington Times (where he was a columnist from '83 to '89), Lofton explained:

Take, for example, this business of so-called "anti-gay violence." This bill will be used to go after only those who commit crimes against people because they are homosexuals. But this is not the most pernicious form of "anti-gay violence." Not by a long shot.

The most violent - indeed fatal 100 percent of the time - form of "anti-gay violence" has been committed not by so-called "homophobes" who bash homosexuals - but by male homosexuals and bisexuals against other male bisexuals and homosexuals.

To date, tens of thousands of male bisexual and homosexual men are dead in our country because of AIDS, because they engaged in high-risk homosexual sex.

Is this not "anti-gay violence" which numbers its victims far beyond anything any "homophobes" have done?

Well, I figured I better deal with this because the nutters were now being turned into "respectable critics" by a media that either had an agenda or were just plain lazy.

So, how crazy are the things they've said about "Bowling for Columbine?" Here are my favorites:

"That scene where you got the gun in the bank was staged!"

Well of course it was staged! It's a movie! We built the "bank" as a set and then I hired actors to play the bank tellers and the manager and we got a toy gun from the prop department and then I wrote some really cool dialogue for me and them to say! Pretty neat, huh?

Or...

The Truth: In the spring of 2001, I saw a real ad in a real newspaper in Michigan announcing a real promotion that this real bank had where they would give you a gun (as your up-front interest) for opening up a Certificate of Deposit account. They promoted this in publications all over the country – "More Bang for Your Buck!"

There was news coverage of this bank giving away guns, long before I even shot the scene there. The Chicago Sun Times wrote about how the bank would "hand you a gun" with the purchase of a CD. Those are the precise words used by a bank employee in the film.

When you see me going in to the bank and walking out with my new gun in "Bowling for Columbine" – that is exactly as it happened. Nothing was done out of the ordinary other than to phone ahead and ask permission to let me bring a camera in to film me opening up my account. I walked into that bank in northern Michigan for the first time ever on that day in June 2001, and, with cameras rolling, gave the bank teller $1,000 – and opened up a 20-year CD account. After you see me filling out the required federal forms ("How do you spell Caucasian?") – which I am filling out here for the first time – the bank manager faxed it to the bank's main office for them to do the background check. The bank is a licensed federal arms dealer and thus can have guns on the premises and do the instant background checks (the ATF's Federal Firearms database—which includes all federally approved gun dealers—lists North Country Bank with Federal Firearms License #4-38-153-01-5C-39922).

Within 10 minutes, the "OK" came through from the firearms background check agency and, 5 minutes later, just as you see it in the film, they handed me a Weatherby Mark V Magnum rifle (If you'd like to see the outtakes, click here).

And it is that very gun that I still own to this day. I have decided the best thing to do with this gun is to melt it down into a bust of John Ashcroft and auction it off on E-Bay (more details on that later). All the proceeds will go to The Brady Campaign To Prevent Gun Violence to fight all these lying gun nuts who have attacked my film and make it possible on a daily basis for America's gun epidemic to rage on.

Here's another whopper I've had to listen to from the pro-gun groups:

"The Lockheed factory in Littleton, Colorado, has nothing to do with weapons of mass destruction!"

That's right! That big honkin' rocket sitting behind the Lockheed spokesman in "Bowling for Columbine"-- the one with "US AIRFORCE" written on it in BIG ASS letters – well, I admit it, I snuck in and painted that on that Titan IV rocket when Lockheed wasn't looking! After all, those rockets were only being used for the Weather Channel! Ha Ha Ha! I sure fooled everyone!!

Or....

The Truth: Lockheed Martin is the largest weapons-maker in the world. The Littleton facility has been manufacturing missiles, missile components, and other weapons systems for almost half a century. In the 50s, workers at the Littleton facility constructed the first Titan intercontinental ballistic missile, designed to unleash a nuclear warhead on the Soviet Union; in the mid-80s, they were partially assembling MX missiles, instruments for the minuteman ICBM, a space laser weapon called Zenith Star, and a Star Wars program known as Brilliant Pebbles.

In the full, unedited interview I did with the Lockheed spokesman, he told me that Lockheed started building nuclear missiles in Littleton and "played a role in the development of Peacekeeper MX Missiles."

As for what's currently manufactured in Littleton, McCollum told me, "They (the rockets sitting behind him) carry mainly very large national security satellites, some we can't talk about." (see him say it here)

Since that interview, the Titan IV rockets manufactured in Littleton have been critical to the war effort in both Afghanistan and Iraq. These rockets launched advanced satellites that were "instrumental in providing command-and-control operations over Iraq...for the rapid targeting of Navy Tomahawk cruise missiles involved in Iraqi strikes and clandestine communications with Special Operations Forces." (view source here).

That Lockheed lets the occasional weather or TV satellite hitch a ride on one of its rockets should not distract anyone from Lockheed's main mission and moneymaker in Littleton: to make instruments that help kill people. That two of Littleton's children decided to engineer their own mass killing is what these guys and the Internet crazies don't want to discuss.

The oddest of all the smears thrown at "Bowling for Columbine" is this one:

"The film depicts NRA president Charlton Heston giving a speech near Columbine; he actually gave it a year later and 900 miles away. The speech he did give is edited to make conciliatory statements sound like rudeness."

Um, yeah, that's right! I made it up! Heston never went there! He never said those things!

Or....

The Truth: Heston took his NRA show to Denver and did and said exactly what we recounted. From the end of my narration setting up Heston's speech in Denver, with my words, "a big pro-gun rally," every word out of Charlton Heston's mouth was uttered right there in Denver, just 10 days after the Columbine tragedy. But don't take my word – read the transcript of his whole speech. Heston devotes the entire speech to challenging the Denver mayor and mocking the mayor's pleas that the NRA "don't come here." Far from deliberately editing the film to make Heston look worse, I chose to leave most of this out and not make Heston look as evil as he actually was.

Why are these gun nuts upset that their brave NRA leader's words are in my film? You'd think they would be proud of the things he said. Except, when intercut with the words of a grieving father (whose son died at Columbine and happened to be speaking in a protest that same weekend Heston was at the convention center), suddenly Charlton Heston doesn't look so good does he? Especially to the people of Denver (and, the following year, to the people of Flint) who were still in shock over the tragedies when Heston showed up.

As for the clip preceding the Denver speech, when Heston proclaims "from my cold dead hands," this appears as Heston is being introduced in narration. It is Heston's most well-recognized NRA image – hoisting the rifle overhead as he makes his proclamation, as he has done at virtually every political appearance on behalf of the NRA (before and since Columbine). I have merely re-broadcast an image supplied to us by a Denver TV station, an image which the NRA has itself crafted for the media, or, as one article put it, "the mantra of dedicated gun owners" which they "wear on T-shirts, stamp it on the outside of envelopes, e-mail it on the Internet and sometimes shout it over the phone.". Are they now embarrassed by this sick, repulsive image and the words that accompany it?

I've also been accused of making up the gun homicide counts in the United States and various countries around the world. That is, like all the rest of this stuff, a bald-face lie. Every statistic in the film is true. They all come directly from the government. Here are the facts, right from the sources:

The U.S. figure of 11,127 gun deaths comes from a report from the Center for Disease Control. Japan's gun deaths of 39 was provided by the National Police Agency of Japan; Germany: 381 gun deaths from Bundeskriminalamt (German FBI); Canada: 165 gun deaths from Statistics Canada, the governmental statistics agency; United Kingdom: 68 gun deaths, from the Centre for Crime and Justice studies in Britain; Australia: 65 gun deaths from the Australian Institute of Criminology; France: 255 gun deaths, from the International Journal of Epidemiology.

Finally, I've even been asked about whether the two killers were at bowling class on the morning of the shootings. Well, that's what their teacher told the investigators, and that's what was corroborated by several eyewitness reports of students to the police, the FBI, and the District Attorney's office. I'll tell you who wasn't there -- me! That's why in the film I pose it as a question:

"So did Dylan and Eric show up that morning and bowl two games before moving on to shoot up the school? And did they just chuck the balls down the lane? Did this mean something?"

Of course, it's a silly discussion, and it misses the whole, larger point: that blaming bowling for their killing spree would be as dumb as blaming Marilyn Manson.

But the gun nuts don't want to discuss either specific points or larger issues because when that debate is held, they lose. Most Americans want stronger gun laws (among others, see the 2001 National Gun Policy Survey from the University of Chicago's National Opinion Research Center) – and the gun lobbies know it. That is why it's critical to distract and alter the debate – and go after anyone who questions why we have so many gun deaths in America (especially if he does it in best selling books and popular films).

I can guarantee to you, without equivocation, that every fact in my movie is true. Three teams of fact-checkers and two groups of lawyers went through it with a fine tooth comb to make sure that every statement of fact is indeed an indisputable fact. Trust me, no film company would ever release a film like this without putting it through the most vigorous vetting process possible. The sheer power and threat of the NRA is reason enough to strike fear in any movie studio or theater chain. The NRA will go after you without mercy if they think there's half a chance of destroying you. That's why we don't have better gun laws in this country – every member of Congress is scared to death of them.

Well, guess what. Total number of lawsuits to date against me or my film by the NRA? NONE. That's right, zero. And don't forget for a second that if they could have shut this film down on a technicality they would have. But they didn't and they can't – because the film is factually solid and above reproach. In fact, we have not been sued by any individual or group over the statements made in "Bowling for Columbine?" Why is that? Because everything we say is true – and the things that are our opinion, we say so and leave it up to the viewer to decide if our point of view is correct or not for each of them.

So, faced with a thoroughly truthful and honest film, those who object to the film's political points are left with the choice of debating us on the issues in the film – or resorting to character assassination. They have chosen the latter. What a sad place to be.

Actually, I have found one typo in the theatrical release of the film. It was a caption that read, "Willie Horton released by Dukakis and kills again." In fact, Willie Horton was a convicted murderer who, after escaping from furlough, raped a woman and stabbed her fiancé, but didn't kill him. The caption has been permanently corrected on the DVD and home video version of the film and replaced with, "Willie Horton released. Then rapes a woman." My apologies to Willie Horton and the Horton family for implying he is a double-murderer when he is only a single-murderer/rapist. And my apologies to the late Lee Atwater who, on his deathbed, apologized for having engineered the smear campaign against Dukakis (but correctly identified Mr. Horton as a single-murderer!).

Well, there you have it. I suppose the people who tell their make-believe stories about me and my work will continue to do so. Maybe they should be sued for knowingly libeling me. Or maybe I'll just keep laughing – laughing all the way to the end of the Bush Administration -- scheduled, I believe, for sometime in November of next year.

Yours,

Michael Moore
Director, "Bowling for Columbine"

PS. From now on, I will deal with all wacko attackos on this page. If you hear something about me that doesn't sound quite right, check in here.

Posted by Lisa at 05:26 PM
August 31, 2003
Bowling For Columbine At The Red Vic, San Francisco Tuesday/Wednesday This Week

This is just a heads up that the latest masterpiece from our fearless leader will be showing this week in San Francisco at the Red Vic - 1727 Haight St.

Tuesday - 7:00, 9:30 Wed - 2:00, 7:00, 9:30

Posted by Lisa at 11:42 PM
April 21, 2003
Just Uploaded Some Duplicate Copies Of The Uncompressed AIFFS From The Oscars

Some people were having trouble downloading the uncompressed AIFF files, so I've saved them with a .aif extension in a different directory:


Did CNN Modify Its Re-broadcast of Michael Moore's Uppity Oscar Acceptance Speech?
.

This is, of course, in reference to this earlier post (Did CNN Turn Up The Boos On Michael Moore?), which, by the way, has a wonderful discussion going on currently about the various technical explanations that could explain the discrepancies between the broadcasts.

Posted by Lisa at 08:02 AM
April 15, 2003
Waveform Analysis Of Michael Moore's Oscar Speech: Evidence That Audio Portion Of CNN Soundtrack Was Altered From Original ABC Broadcast?

Thanks to Tristan for creating these waveform comparisons of the original ABC feed and the CNN rebroadcast. Thanks so much for putting this up!

Some data extracted from Michael Moore's speech, as transmitted on CNN and ABC


Some data extracted from Michael Moore's speech, as transmitted on CNN and ABC

The audio files were downloaded from http://www.lisarein.com/michaelmoore/michaelmoorecompare.html. I cropped the most controversial 'booh' part in the two versions, when he says tells "...that elected a ficticious president.... we...".
I compiled a stereo file with each version on each channel, submitted it to common analysis tools in a sound-editing program, and ended up with this (click on the images for a high resolution version)...

In the audio version, the stereo file with each version on each channel, you can clearly spot the difference between the two speeches. I let you hear where the booooohs come from. FYI, CNN's channel is on the left.

The conclusion

is as always up to you

Here is the full text of the page in case the link goes bad:

http://asyo.com/michaelmooresspeech/

Some data extracted from Michael Moore's speech, as transmitted on CNN and ABC

The audio files were downloaded from http://www.lisarein.com/michaelmoore/michaelmoorecompare.html. I cropped the most controversial 'booh' part in the two versions, when he says tells "...that elected a ficticious president.... we...".
I compiled a stereo file with each version on each channel, submitted it to common analysis tools in a sound-editing program, and ended up with this (click on the images for a high resolution version) :
Spectrum:

moore's speech ABC retransmission

Notice the strength of the horizontal curve of the (enthusiastic?) whoo.

moore's speech CNN retransmission

Notice the strength of the boo's (red lines), and how the whoo now swims in the background... The noise coming from the public is strangely louder under the two "booooo's"
Waveform:

moore's speech waveform, both channels

CNN's signal is blue, ABC's is red, the overlapping zone is dark.
Sound:

In the audio version, the stereo file with each version on each channel, you can clearly spot the difference between the two speeches. I let you hear where the booooohs come from. FYI, CNN's channel is on the left.
The conclusion

is as always up to you


Posted by Lisa at 10:43 AM
April 11, 2003
Did CNN Modify Its Re-broadcast of Michael Moore's Uppity Oscar Acceptance Speech?

Something to keep you busy over the weekend!

Check out the video and audio from the live ABC broadcast and compare it for yourself to the video and audio of the CNN re-broadcast:


Did CNN Turn Up The Boos During Michael Moore's Speech?

Michael Moore At The Oscars: ABC's Live Audio vs. CNN's Re-broadcast

This is a quote from my introduction:


...I decided to help Ellison Horne out by digitizing and posting his video footage on the internet so the debate over this issue could begin, and so we could all look over the evidence together in order to determine whether or not the audio track was altered in the CNN rebroadcast...

This is a quote from Ellison's introduction:


I'm urgently calling for an investigation of the broadcast by CNN and CNN Headline News's reporting of Michael Moore's acceptance speech last month at the Academy Awards.

CNN and CNN Headline News aired a significantly different audio response to Mr. Moore's speech than was orginally broadcasted on ABC.

It seems that someone has manipulated the audio to give the impression there was constant loud "booing" throughout Moore's speech, when in reality, there was only marginal booing often overridden with cheers and applause.

This needs to be fully investigated.

Posted by Lisa at 04:34 PM
March 30, 2003
New Michael Moore Movie In The Works

Michael Moore plans Bush-bin Laden film


"The senior Bush kept his ties with the bin Laden family up until two months after Sept. 11," said Moore.

Moore told Variety the primary focus of the new project will be to examine what has happened to the United States since the Sept. 11 terrorist attack. He accused the Bush administration of using a tragic event to push its agenda.

"It (the new project) certainly does deal with the Bush and bin Laden ties," said Moore. "It asks a number of questions that I don't have the answers to yet, but which I intend to find out."

Moore said he expects the new movie to be in U.S. theaters in time for the 2004 presidential election...

"I expressed exactly what was in the film and instead of being blacklisted, I've not only gotten a deal to fund 'Fahrenheit 911' but offers on the film after," he said. "Presales on ('Bowling for Columbine's') video release ran ahead of 'Chicago' this week, and my book is returning to the top spot on the New York Times best-seller list."

Moore said the success of his documentary and book reflects majority public support for his political argument.

"It's because the majority of Americans agree with me, see the economy in the toilet and didn't vote for George W," he said. "People are now realizing you can question your government while still caring about the soldiers."

Here is the full text of the article in case the link goes bad:

http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030328-032440-7289r

Michael Moore plans Bush-bin Laden film

From the Life & Mind Desk
Published 3/28/2003 4:00 PM
View printer-friendly version

LOS ANGELES, March 28 (UPI) -- Filmmaker Michael Moore's next project might be more controversial than his Oscar-winning documentary "Bowling for Columbine."

According to a report in Friday's Daily Variety, Moore is working on a documentary about the "the murky relationship" between former President George Bush and the family of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden. The paper said the movie, "Fahrenheit 911," will suggest that the bin Laden family profited greatly from the association.

Moore's anti-war, anti-Bush Oscar acceptance speech provoked a mixture of cheers and boos at the Academy Awards last Sunday.

In addition to the Best Documentary Oscar, "Bowling for Columbine" also had an extraordinarily robust bottom line. Made for about $3 million, it has grossed nearly $40 million worldwide -- making it one of the most commercially successful documentaries of all time.

Variety reported that Moore is working out a deal with Mel Gibson's production company, Icon Productions, to finance "Fahrenheit 911."

According to Moore, the former president had a business relationship with Osama bin Laden's father, Mohammed bin Laden, a Saudi construction magnate who left $300 million to Osama bin Laden. It has been widely reported that bin Laden used the inheritance to finance global terrorism.

Moore said the bin Laden family was heavily invested in the Carlyle Group, a private global investment firm that the filmmaker said frequently buys failing defense companies and then sells them at a profit. Former President Bush has reportedly served as a senior adviser with the firm.

"The senior Bush kept his ties with the bin Laden family up until two months after Sept. 11," said Moore.

Moore told Variety the primary focus of the new project will be to examine what has happened to the United States since the Sept. 11 terrorist attack. He accused the Bush administration of using a tragic event to push its agenda.

"It (the new project) certainly does deal with the Bush and bin Laden ties," said Moore. "It asks a number of questions that I don't have the answers to yet, but which I intend to find out."

Moore said he expects the new movie to be in U.S. theaters in time for the 2004 presidential election.

While some critics accused Moore of being anti-American for his Oscar speech, Moore told Variety business has been very good for his movie and his best-selling book "Stupid White Men: And Other Sorry Excuses for the State of the Nation."

"I expressed exactly what was in the film and instead of being blacklisted, I've not only gotten a deal to fund 'Fahrenheit 911' but offers on the film after," he said. "Presales on ('Bowling for Columbine's') video release ran ahead of 'Chicago' this week, and my book is returning to the top spot on the New York Times best-seller list."

Moore said the success of his documentary and book reflects majority public support for his political argument.

"It's because the majority of Americans agree with me, see the economy in the toilet and didn't vote for George W," he said. "People are now realizing you can question your government while still caring about the soldiers."

Posted by Lisa at 09:24 AM
March 24, 2003
Michael Moore Comes Through At The Oscars

Ha! Another media disinformation campaign. A friend was telling me how he was hearing that "everyone was booing" when Moore took advantage of this rare opportunity to sneak some truth out to the nation.

You can listen and decide for yourself, but I hear as much clapping as booing as our fearless leader, right on schedule, says what needed to be said.

I don't even know if this is a complete clip yet, but I wanted to make it available for you asap: Michael Moore At The Oscars

There's a video stream of Q and A with Michael afterwards here too.

(Thanks to The Rattler and Kevin Burton for help finding this stuff.)

Posted by Lisa at 02:27 PM
March 23, 2003
Michael Moore Directs New 'System Of A Down' War Protest Video



System Of A Down: Boom! Video and News Blog

Posted by Lisa at 05:24 PM
March 22, 2003
To The Shrub, With Love (From Michael Moore)


A Letter from Michael Moore to George W. Bush on the Eve of War

By Micheal Moore.


2. The majority of Americans -- the ones who never elected you -- are not fooled by your weapons of mass distraction. We know what the real issues are that affect our daily lives -- and none of them begin with I or end in Q. Here's what threatens us: two and a half million jobs lost since you took office, the stock market having become a cruel joke, no one knowing if their retirement funds are going to be there, gas now costs almost two dollars -- the list goes on and on. Bombing Iraq will not make any of this go away. Only you need to go away for things to improve.

3. As Bill Maher said last week, how bad do you have to suck to lose a popularity contest with Saddam Hussein? The whole world is against you, Mr. Bush. Count your fellow Americans among them.

4. The Pope has said this war is wrong, that it is a SIN. The Pope! But even worse, the Dixie Chicks have now come out against you! How bad does it have to get before you realize that you are an army of one on this war? Of course, this is a war you personally won't have to fight. Just like when you went AWOL while the poor were shipped to Vietnam in your place.

5. Of the 535 members of Congress, only ONE (Sen. Johnson of South Dakota) has an enlisted son or daughter in the armed forces! If you really want to stand up for America, please send your twin daughters over to Kuwait right now and let them don their chemical warfare suits. And let's see every member of Congress with a child of military age also sacrifice their kids for this war effort. What's that you say? You don't THINK so? Well, hey, guess what -- we don't think so either!

...Well, cheer up -- there IS good news. If you do go through with this war, more than likely it will be over soon because I'm guessing there aren't a lot of Iraqis willing to lay down their lives to protect Saddam Hussein. After you "win" the war, you will enjoy a huge bump in the popularity polls as everyone loves a winner -- and who doesn't like to see a good ass-whoopin' every now and then (especially when it 's some third world ass!). So try your best to ride this victory all the way to next year's election. Of course, that's still a long ways away, so we'll all get to have a good hardy-har-har while we watch the economy sink even further down the toilet!

Here is the full text of the letter in case the link goes bad:

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php

Monday, March 17, 2003

A Letter from Michael Moore to George W. Bush on the Eve of War

George W. Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington, DC

Dear Governor Bush:

So today is what you call "the moment of truth," the day that "France and the rest of world have to show their cards on the table." I'm glad to hear that this day has finally arrived. Because, I gotta tell ya, having survived 440 days of your lying and conniving, I wasn't sure if I could take much more. So I'm glad to hear that today is Truth Day, 'cause I got a few truths I would like to share with you:

1. There is virtually NO ONE in America (talk radio nutters and Fox News aside) who is gung-ho to go to war. Trust me on this one. Walk out of the White House and on to any street in America and try to find five people who are PASSIONATE about wanting to kill Iraqis. YOU WON'T FIND THEM! Why? 'Cause NO Iraqis have ever come here and killed any of us! No Iraqi has even threatened to do that. You see, this is how we average Americans think: If a certain so-and-so is not perceived as a threat to our lives, then, believe it or not, we don't want to kill him! Funny how that works!

2. The majority of Americans -- the ones who never elected you -- are not fooled by your weapons of mass distraction. We know what the real issues are that affect our daily lives -- and none of them begin with I or end in Q. Here's what threatens us: two and a half million jobs lost since you took office, the stock market having become a cruel joke, no one knowing if their retirement funds are going to be there, gas now costs almost two dollars -- the list goes on and on. Bombing Iraq will not make any of this go away. Only you need to go away for things to improve.

3. As Bill Maher said last week, how bad do you have to suck to lose a popularity contest with Saddam Hussein? The whole world is against you, Mr. Bush. Count your fellow Americans among them.

4. The Pope has said this war is wrong, that it is a SIN. The Pope! But even worse, the Dixie Chicks have now come out against you! How bad does it have to get before you realize that you are an army of one on this war? Of course, this is a war you personally won't have to fight. Just like when you went AWOL while the poor were shipped to Vietnam in your place.

5. Of the 535 members of Congress, only ONE (Sen. Johnson of South Dakota) has an enlisted son or daughter in the armed forces! If you really want to stand up for America, please send your twin daughters over to Kuwait right now and let them don their chemical warfare suits. And let's see every member of Congress with a child of military age also sacrifice their kids for this war effort. What's that you say? You don't THINK so? Well, hey, guess what -- we don't think so either!

6. Finally, we love France. Yes, they have pulled some royal screw-ups. Yes, some of them can be pretty damn annoying. But have you forgotten we wouldn't even have this country known as America if it weren't for the French? That it was their help in the Revolutionary War that won it for us? That our greatest thinkers and founding fathers -- Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, etc. -- spent many years in Paris where they refined the concepts that lead to our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution? That it was France who gave us our Statue of Liberty, a Frenchman who built the Chevrolet, and a pair of French brothers who invented the movies? And now they are doing what only a good friend can do -- tell you the truth about yourself, straight, no b.s. Quit pissing on the French and thank them for getting it right for once. You know, you really should have traveled more (like once) before you took over. Your ignorance of the world has not only made you look stupid, it has painted you into a corner you can't get out of.

Well, cheer up -- there IS good news. If you do go through with this war, more than likely it will be over soon because I'm guessing there aren't a lot of Iraqis willing to lay down their lives to protect Saddam Hussein. After you "win" the war, you will enjoy a huge bump in the popularity polls as everyone loves a winner -- and who doesn't like to see a good ass-whoopin' every now and then (especially when it 's some third world ass!). So try your best to ride this victory all the way to next year's election. Of course, that's still a long ways away, so we'll all get to have a good hardy-har-har while we watch the economy sink even further down the toilet!

But, hey, who knows -- maybe you'll find Osama a few days before the election! See, start thinking like THAT! Keep hope alive! Kill Iraqis -- they got our oil!!

Yours,

Michael Moore
www.michaelmoore.com

Posted by Lisa at 09:04 PM
January 15, 2003
November 17, 2002
Michael Moore On Tech TV

Bit Chat: Michael Moore
The controversial filmmaker crusades to save the Internet from corporate control.
By Dave Roos for Tech TV.
(Thanks, Cory!)


One of Moore's greatest fears is that the Internet will come under the same corporate onslaught as FM radio. It's hard for many of us to imagine, but FM radio used to be a lot like the Web. It was open, inexpensive, and independent. The music was all that mattered.

"Then they sucked the life right out of it," Moore growls, referring of course to the corporate interests that bought out the FM frequency in the 1970s. The result is mind-numbing musical homogeneity. "It doesn't matter where you go today," Moore laments. "The FM station in St. Louis sounds like the FM station in Tampa."

The same fate could await the Web. "Sooner or later," Moore warns, "the forces of capitalism are going to say, 'Wait a minute, this should only be about making money. If it's not making us money, it shouldn't be on the Internet.' We have to prevent that from happening."

Posted by Lisa at 03:15 PM
November 15, 2002
Michael Moore: The Webzine Keynote

Webzine has posted Michael Moore's Keynote from last summer in NY City as a stream or a downloadable MP3 file (Please mirror this file -- Note: I have already done so here.)


Michael Moore gave a keynote speech on July 21, 2001 for Webzine 2001 in New York City. He spoke about the Internet as a revolutionary medium that can empower the little guy, how the Internet helped TV Nation win another season, a powerful scene from Bowling for Columbine, a dirty little chat with Bill Clinton at a porto-potty and a few inspirational stories to motivate YOU to get out there and do something.

Michael Moore speech - 1hr 26mins, 128k MP3 stream
Downloadable MP3 - 80MB MP3 file. Please download and mirror this.

Posted by Lisa at 05:23 PM
October 30, 2002
Moore on Donahue Show - A Real Hit!

Michael Moore was great on the Donahue show!

I made a few VHS copies that I will keep as masters, in case anyone wants a copy of the show (now, or in the future). Just send me an email.

Posted by Lisa at 10:56 AM
October 27, 2002
Catch Michael Moore On Donahue Monday Night

Michael Moore will be on the Donahue Show for a full hour this Monday night at 8pm on MSNBC!

Spread the word!

And if you have another second or two, please email "cable@msnbc.com" and "warn them to not pre-empt the show again." (Michael asks for this favor at the bottom right of his website.)

Here's what I just sent:


Dear MSNBC,

I am a web journalist writing to let you know how much I am looking forward
to this Monday's Donahue show with guest Michael Moore.

I sure hope the show does not get pre-empted again!

Thanks,

Lisa Rein
lisarein@finetuning.com


Posted by Lisa at 01:42 PM
October 20, 2002
Bowling For Columbine Rocks!

Michael Moore has created another masterpiece and accomplished a number of excellent goals in the process (like getting K-Mart to stop selling gun ammunition).

Bowling for Columbine is funny. Timely, and well worth the cash.
Go see it quick before it leaves town!

Here's an interview with Michael Moore about the film.

Here's another review from Common Dreams:

by Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

Here's the full text of the links I cite in case they go bad:

http://www.abc.net.au/arts/film/stories/s654932.htm


Link back to The Space ABC Arts Online homepage
Go to filmGo to musicGo to booksGo to Signal regional artsGo to digital artsGo to Splatt! kids' artsGo to visual artsGo to designGo to performanceGo to ABC Arts Online homepage

Go to The Space ABC Arts Online Sitemap | Go to Contact Us | Go to About Us
Related Stories graphic

Craig Baldwin: Raider of the Lost Reel
5 December 2001

FAKING IT: THE MOCKUMENTARY
4 January 2002

Mike Moore reflects

Mike Moore laughs

Mike Moore making his point

Film : Feature graphic
Mike Moore Speaks:
Bowling for Columbine

Mike Moore at Cannes Film Festival 2002
Mike Moore at the Cannes
Film Festival 2002
On the morning of Tuesday 20 April 1999 in the middle-class town of Littleton, Colorado, USA, Eric Harris (18) and Dylan Klebold (17) began a rampage through the corridors of Columbine High School that ultimately ended their own lives and those of thirteen others; twenty-five more were injured.


Homemade bombs and explosive devices were found planted around the building and several survivors later reported that Harris and Klebold were smiling and laughing as they shot their fellow students.

This outrage shook the whole country and inspired Moore to make Bowling for Columbine to explore issues of gun control, racism and the politics of fear in America.

Bowling for Columbine became the first documentary to be invited to the Cannes Film Festival official selection for fifty-five years. It competed for the prestigious Palm D’Or with traditional feature films such as, The Pianist (Roman Polanski), All or Nothing (Mike Leigh), Kedma (Amos Gitai) and more than a dozen others.

Bowling for Columbine was awarded a newly created special award and many critics hailed the feature length documentary as a sign of the rebirth of the form.

Much sought after by the press and fans in Cannes, Moore conducted dozens of press conferences. In this fascinating session before a crowded room of international press and American film students he discusses his fears, obsessions, movie making techniques and some of the incidents that took place during the making of Bowling for Columbine.

Question and answer session discussing Bowling for Columbine, at the American pavilion, Cannes Film Festival, May 22, 2002,

Moderator: Elvis Mitchell, film critic of the New York Times.

Elvis Mitchell:
Your style is a mixture of journalism and entertainment. The style is forceful but not hectoring. In Bowling for Columbine you discuss not just gun control but also racism and the media created culture of fear.

Mike Moore:
I thought it would be interesting to take a journey through this culture of fear. Most journalism does the who, what, when, where and how questions. But very few people in the media ask why does this happen? Why do we have 250 million guns in our homes especially when there’s been a huge decrease in crime?

Elvis Mitchell:
A lot of your movie style is about serendipity too.
Mike Moore on Moments of Serendipity
Video of Mike Moore - "Moments of Serpendipity" (29 secs, 1.4 Mb Real Media File)

Mike Moore:
We stopped in for gas at a gas station and, if you’ve seen the movie, there’s a kid who wishes he was number one on the bomb suspect list but was bummed out because he was number two suspect after Columbine in the local school in Michigan.

We found him because he saw the camera equipment in the car and one of our film producers told him what we were doing and the kid says, ’Oh, I went to school here with Eric Harris one of the kids who did the killings here at Columbine – we were in the same class together.’

And it’s like (for me), ’Don’t say anymore’. Because if you say it and he has to say it a second time, it’ll sound like he repeated it.

So then we got the camera gear out, and that’s even before we knew about him being on the bomb list. He told us this incredible story about making bombs and napalm and being number two on the bomb list. And so many of those things we find out are in those moments of serendipity.

I don’t start with a rigid script. I don’t have a thesis that I have to shoehorn every interview into and I love being surprised and my own thinking being proved wrong.
I ring the bell at the gate and out of the box comes the voice of Moses. I’m thinking, ‘Holy shit, I don’t deserve this kind of good luck.

You know, finding Heston, we tried for two years to get him. We’re on the way to the airport in LA and someone in the van says, ’Lets get a Star Map and see if we can find Heston’.
Mike Moore speaking about Finding Heston
Video of Mike Moore - "Out of the box comes the voice of Moses" (40 secs, 1.9 Mb Real Media File)

I said, ‘Those things are no good, those things are bogus’.

But they started up like kids, ‘Na, I wanna a starmap, let’s get a starmap’.

And I say, ‘Yeah, ok’. So we stop and when we get one I say, ’Look at this. See what I’m tellin’ ya. Here’s the home of Andre Agassi and Brooke Shieilds - there is no home of Andre Agassi and Brooke Sheilds’.

‘Na, but there’s Heston. Lets go see if it’s real.’

So we drive up the road. I didn’t expect it to be his house. When you see the movie you’ll notice we didn’t even bother to wipe off the bird dirt from the wind shield. The guys are shooting it from in the van as we’re driving. So I ring the bell at the gate and out of the box comes the voice of Moses. I’m thinkin’, ‘Holy shit I don’t deserve this kind of good luck. I can’t believe I wasn’t going to get the star map and get up here’.

[ Editor’s note. Heston politely agreed to a television interview for the next day where upon Moore asked detailed questions about the nature of the National Rifle Association.]
Historians will write about us in the same way we now read of the Greeks and the Romans - as warrior cultures hell bent on killing people.

Audience member:
I grew up near Littleton (where the massacre took place) and I thought you handled the subject very sensitively. What attracted you to the story?

Mike Moore:
Remember there was a spate of these suburban school massacres. I was just intrigued that they were all occurring in these white, middle class communities. I guess that was one of the first things I thought about and I quickly came to the conclusion that we don’t know why, and probably no one will ever really know why these two kids did this.

It became a less important question to ask why they did it than to take a look at the fabric of the society we live in and the culture they lived in. Not just in Littleton but in any small town. You could’ve thrown a dart at any town on the map in America and done a tour similar to the one I did in Denver of the military installations, of the nuclear missles, the military culture that we live in.

Historians will write about us in the same way we now read of the Greeks and the Romans - as warrior cultures hell bent on killing people. We think of ourselves as more civilised but trust me, in 500 years from now that’s how historians and anthropologists will describe us - as a very strange group.

Thanks for liking the film. I’m very concerned about how people will take this in Denver and Littleton I wouldn’t want anyone to feel anymore pain than they already feel. The worst school massacre did not happen in Columbine it happened in Bath, Michigan in 1927. The school board treasurer put dynamite in the basement of the school and killed 44 children. We’ve always had crazy people. What you’ve got to try to do is make sure that when they snap, they don’t have easy access to assault weapons.
… every bad thing that has happened to me in my life, every piece of harm, has been from white people.

Elvis Mitchell:
Fear is one of the main themes.

Mike Moore:
I wanted to ask, ‘What are we afraid of?’. I wanted to do a word association with white people. Instead of words, I’d do pictures and so I’d go to the white suburbs and say, ‘You’ve got these burglar alarms, locks and these guns. Who are you afraid of? What is the first thing that comes to mind when you think of someone who’s going to hurt you?”.

‘Is it a woman?’. So right away,’No’. Nobody believes a woman is going to mug them, break into their homes, kill them, rape them. It’s never a woman. You can eliminate 53% of the population right there.

‘So it’s a man, isn’t it?’. Then, let me ask you this: ’Is it little freckle faced Jimmy here, or is it Hakim?’. And a number of them were quite honest and those who weren’t honest would give, ’Well, I’m afraid of both of them’.

‘Come on’, I’d say. ‘Sweet little Jimmy here, that’s not who’s in your head. Why is Hakim, or Jose in your head? Who’s done this to you? Is it your personal experience?’

I write about it in my book - every bad thing that has happened to me in my life, every piece of harm, has been from white people. I have never had a black car salesman rip me off. I have never had a black landlord hold back my security deposit. I have never had a black teacher hold back giving me a grade I deserved.

I go back to when I was a kid. I’m thinking, ‘Jeez, every single thing has had a white face on it. Why would I be afraid of anybody black?’. And yet white people, - that would be most of you in here - if I could ask you honestly, or attach a heart monitor as you walk through any major city in America – the difference between three black teenagers walking towards you and three white one’s - I guarantee your heart is going to beat a little faster when it’s the black kids. And I’ll even admit that, and I believe I don’t have a racist bone in my body. So how has it embedded itself in my physiology? It’s so ingrained, so beaten into us from such an early age. How do we escape this?

Elvis Mitchell:
Did you ever think of using a clip from ‘Birth of a Nation’ (1916 film which portrays blacks as rapists and the Ku Klux Klan as heroes) because that really is where the stigma began being attached to black people. That is the beginning of it.

Mike Moore:
That’s right, and people say, ’But Mike, that was a long time ago. Why are you talking about it now?’ But as I pointed out in my book, my grandfather was born three years after the civil war (1865) so it’s not that long ago.

This (racism) is a horrible, immoral, vicious legacy [and] we still live with the results of it until this day. We have not addressed it. We refuse to bring it up. I’m bringing it up because I want us to deal with it. I want to deal with it personally and I don’t mean dealing with it in the namby pamby liberal way of patronising it. I’m saying, ‘Let’s just cut the bullshit, white man, and resolve this’.
Mike Moore ponders

Elvis Mitchell:
But one of the guys who was one of America’s biggest liberals, who marched with Martin Luther King in the ‘60’s, is in your film, [Charlton Heston] who is now one of the biggest representatives of the other side.

Mike Moore:
Right, Charlton Heston. He was a liberal democrat in the 1960’s. He was there marching with [Martin Luther] King. Before I got into the main discussion you see in the film I was talking to him about movies and politics and asked, ’Where did you make the change from Liberal Democrat to Conservative Republican?’

He said, ’Well, I was in Northern California in 1964 and I was making a film, Major Dundee. I was driving down the road and there was a Barry Goldwater for President billboard and it said, ‘In Your Heart You Know He’s Right’. I looked at the billboard and it was almost a vision and suddenly in my heart I knew he was right - and at that moment I made the switch’.
I show a fifty year period from 1953 to now of US intervention worldwide - and it’s a pretty ugly story.

Mike Moore:
When we first went to Littleton I did not know that the number one employer of the parents of the Columbine massacre kids was Lockheed Martin – the number one weapons manufacturer in the United States. I was shocked that we didn’t know this – not that it means anything specifically. I’m not saying that because your parents build MX missles your kids are going to kill a lot of kids at school. I’m not making that connection. I’m just saying military culture is woven into the fabric of American society in ways that we don’t even think about.

So I’m talking to a spokesman from Lockheed - they actually let me in the factory - and I said, ‘Do you think anyone makes the connection here (between building weapons and using them)?’.

He said, ’No, these weapons we’re building, they’re for defence and as Americans we don’t just go and drop bombs on people or fire weapons at them (like the kids did at Columbine)’. We cut that into the film before September 11th.

What a horrible day that was (9/11). We live in New York but we were in Los Angeles … and we got a hire car and drove across America by the Southern route. But instead of hearing the bloodthirsty cries for revenge which I thought we’d hear in Texas, Oklahoma and Missouri, what we heard in the diners, in the motels and on the talk back radio was a lot of questions: ’Why?’ ‘Who did this?’ ‘Why do they hate us?’.

There was an innocence about the way the question was posed and after we got back home I thought; we should put the why in here. So I show [in the film] a fifty year period from 1953 to now of US intervention worldwide - and it’s a pretty ugly story.
Mike Moore telling his story

I took that sequence out and then put it back in because I was thinking, ’This is too harsh, this is really a bucket of cold water in people’s face’. But I want to make the type of film that doesn’t preach to the converted. I want people to be able to listen to me. I don’t want them to go, ’What’s wrong with this guy? Doesn’t he like this country?’ Because I love this country. I want it to get better. So in the end I decided to keep it in - it’s got to be said and I know it’s pretty confronting.

Elvis Mitchell:
You showed the aftermath of September 11th; people buying gas masks and buying guns. Were you concerned about using that as one of the motifs of the picture?

Mike Moore:
Here’s why this should be in the movie. Because of the way fear works, the best way to convince people to be afraid is to show them enough truth, enough that is real so that they will be afraid.
I’m a non-violent person so I’m not going to revolt or rebel with weapons or violence so my sense of humour, my desire to ridicule those in power is very strong and I want to encourage other people to use it.

Audience member:
You have a lot of humour in your work. Why?

Mike Moore:
I think that humour can be the most devastating of weapons, and ridicule is probably the worst. To ridicule those in power. For example: on our TV show (The Awful Truth) there was a guy [and] his HMO (personal medical insurance) wouldn’t cover his operation - so he was going to die. So we went and conducted the guy’s funeral on the lawn of the headquarters of his HMO. It so ridiculed and shamed them that three days later they paid for the guy’s operation and he lived.

And I know some people don’t like that and don’t like the method but when you come from where we come from, what are our tools? I’m a non-violent person so I’m not going to revolt or rebel with weapons or violence so my sense of humour or my desire to ridicule those in power is very strong and I want to encourage other people to use it. Because it’s an effective weapon to make things better.

Elvis Mitchell:
Tell me why you joined the National Rifle Association

Mike Moore:
I got an automatic junior membership in Boy Scouts. But of course back then the NRA did gun safety classes. It was a sports organisation, not a front for a right wing agenda. I then rejoined after Columbine with the intention of finding out all I could.

One of the stunts we pulled was with K-Mart where the kids bought the bullets for Columbine. I go to the K-Mart headquarters in Troy, Michigan to ask K-Mart to stop selling bullets for handguns and assault weapons. We went there one day and we went back the second day with press and a bunch of bullets that a kid had bought the night before at K-Mart. Within hours they came down. We could see the guy when we got there. He had the look on his face like he knew it was over. Within an hour they announced they were going to stop selling bullets in all 2300 stores. And you can see the look on my face because I’m used to being tossed out of these places - getting the short shrift. All I could think of was to shake hands and say thanks.
… and the longer we go without saying what needs to be said the more they continue to shred the constitution, take away our civil liberties and move the country to the right.
Mike Moore laughs

Audience member:
When you enter these adversarial situations do you ever feel uncomfortable and nervous or do you always feel excited?

Mike Moore:
I am actually very nervous. My stomach is in a hundred knots when I walk into these places. It may look like something else on camera but I’m very nervous. I go to the bathroom first. I’m an introverted person who likes to keep to himself and is nervous around people. I had two dates in High School I was always waiting for someone to ask me out.

Elvis Mitchell:
Where does this confrontational performance style come from?

Mike Moore:
I didn’t make Roger and Me until I was 35. I just get to the point where if nobody is going to do it then I just gotta go do it. There’s this nagging thing that I think, ’God’, I’ve been feeling this about 9/11. Where’s the movie on this? The real one?’.

I’ve been playing with this animated feature I’ve been doing for fun but then it’s, ’Ah, shit. I have to make this (9/11) film’ … because I don’t think it’s going to get made and the longer we go without saying what needs to be said the more they continue to shred the constitution, take away our civil liberties and move the country to the right.

It’s vital. Otherwise nobody will try and ask the question, ’Why do they hate us?’. I just think we’ve been lied to so much.
Journalism works like an assembly line worker building a car. There’s a certain way of doing things and if I do it the same way each time I actually get a pay check at the end of the week. And unfortunately that’s the level of journalism in the States.

Audience member:
Is there a right wing conspiracy in the media?

Mike Moore:
I’ve never suggested a conspiracy. It’s not a conspriacy when Time and Newsweek end up with the same covers week after week. I think that we’re all in a general mind set in the news media. Journalism works like an assembly line worker building a car. There’s a certain way of doing things and if I do it the same way each time I actually get a pay check at the end of the week. And unfortunately that’s the level of journalism in the States.

But I’m concerned about the creation of fear –the idea of the malevolent, ’other’. After about two days in the Middle East you notice how similar everyone is and and you really don’t know if that person is Jewish or Arab … or whether the food is Arab food or Israeli food or the music.

One thing that strikes me is how this concept of fear has been used not just in America but around the world through the ages - where this person is different, is your enemy - when in fact this person is you. It’s so crazy, and the way that those with power, money and greed as their motives manipulate this [fear] to create a world of haves and have nots. I think that ultimately is what is underneath all of this.


Bowling for Columbine will screen in Australian cinemas later this year.

Reporter/Video: John Doggett Williams
****

http://www.commondreams.org/views02/1019-06.htm


Common Dreams NewsCenter
Support Common Dreams


Home | Newswire | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up
Sunday, October 20, 2002

Featured Views



Published on Saturday, October 19, 2002 by CommonDreams.org
Bowling for Baghdad
by Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

Last week, your nation's capital was a bit more surreal than usual.

First and foremost, there is the sniper.

And just when the sniper arrives in the neighborhood, here comes Michael Moore with his much awaited critique of violence in America -- Bowling for Columbine.

We have three words of advice: go see it.

In one scene, Moore, a lifetime member of the National Rifle Association, goes to door to door in Toronto, Canada, doesn't knock, and just walks in.

Apparently, in Canada, many people don't lock their doors.

This in a country, Canada, where there are 7 million guns for a population of 33 million.

But in Canada there are fewer than 400 gun deaths a year.

In the United States, we hit 400 in two weeks -- that's 11,000 gun deaths a year.

In the U.S., eight children under the age of 18 are killed by guns in America every day.

Moore raises a disturbing question: if it's just the guns, stupid, then how come Canadians are not slaughtering themselves the way we are slaughtering ourselves?

This question takes Moore to Littleton, Colorado, the site of the Columbine massacre, home to the war machine Lockheed Martin, the war machine that sponsors the news on National Public Radio.

There he interviews a spokesperson for Lockheed Martin, who tells Moore that the weapons the company builds there are used by the United States for defensive purposes.

Moore then cues up the war footage and runs through the history of U.S. aggression throughout the world -- from Central American, to the Middle East, to Southeast Asia.

This juxtaposition of government and corporate violence with grainy film from the Columbine school's security camera capturing young children massacring young children drives home Moore's larger point -- that the violence and duplicity in our society starts at the top.

Which brings us back to our nation's capital, where both parties' leadership, in part at the urging of the military-industrial-complex, gave the green light last week for a pre-emptive attack on Iraq.

We attended a press conference held by House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt (D-Missouri), the day after Gephardt went to the White House, stood by Bush, and gave the green light for war.

We had with us an editorial from that morning's St. Louis Post Dispatch titled "Gephardt Caves." Our sentiment exactly.

In it, Gephardt's hometown paper said that the reason he sided with Bush was because he wanted to be Speaker of the House, and then President. (This pattern, by the way, followed for other Democratic presidential hopefuls -- Tom Daschle (D-South Dakota), Hillary Clinton (D-New York), John Kerry (D-Massachusetts), Joseph Lieberman (D-Connecticut), Diane Feinstein (D-California), John Edwards (D-North Carolina) -- all of whom voted with Bush on the war.)

All said it was not about politics -- not when young (American) lives are at stake.

But the Post-Dispatch called Gephardt on it.

Gephardt "protests too much when he says he is rising above politics."

"He wants to be speaker of the House -- or president," the Post Dispatch wrote. "He can't achieve either goal taking an unpopular stand against a war against Saddam."

We asked Gephardt whether he wanted be speaker or President.

"That's irrelevant," he shot back.

Not.

We then went over to the White House, where Ari Fleischer was conducting one of his press briefings.

We wanted to know about a two-sentence letter from Theodore Sorensen, the former legal advisor to President John F. Kennedy, that was published in the New York Times.

Sorensen wrote this:

"President Bush has not yet openly reprimanded his press secretary, Ari Fleischer, for suggesting that 'a bullet' is the cheapest way of accomplishing his goal of regime change in Iraq. Is it possible that the United States now endorses for other countries a policy of presidential assassination, the very epitome of terrorism, after our own tragic experience with that despicable act?"

So, Ari, did the President reprimand you?

Ari says: "As far as that is concerned, on the policy, as you know -- I think you were here when I said on the record that that is not -- and people heard it the day I said it -- that is not a statement of administration policy."

But did the President reprimand you for saying that?

Ari says: "I think I have made the views clear of where the White House is on this."

Not.

We then head back over to the Congress, where the war-mongerer Senator Lieberman was releasing a Senate Governmental Affairs report on why Enron happened.

The conclusion: "All the public and private agencies that were supposed to exercise oversight and protect investors failed miserably."

The report was especially critical of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for failing to review any of Enron's annual reports after its 1997 filing. Before going over to the Lieberman briefing, we rang up former SEC chair Arthur Levitt.

We asked Levitt what we should ask Lieberman.

"Ask him -- where was Lieberman?" Levitt told us. "He was busy tying up the SEC in knots over auditors' independence, over the budget, and over options accounting."

We put this to Lieberman.

Lieberman gets testy and shoots back:

"Well, I hope he didn't say that, and if he did, it is grossly unfair and inaccurate."

Actually, quite fair and accurate.

Michael Moore is a political agitator.

Go to see his movie -- and take as many friends and family members with you as possible.

Gephardt, Lieberman and Bush are political leaders.

Listen to them, and you can only get angry -- and then organize to kick these guys out of office.

Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime Reporter. Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Multinational Monitor, http://www.multinationalmonitor.org. They are co-authors of Corporate Predators: The Hunt for MegaProfits and the Attack on Democracy (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1999; http://www.corporatepredators.org).

(c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

###

FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Posted by Lisa at 01:37 PM
March 31, 2002
Excerpt from new Michael Moore Book

Here's an excerpt from Michael Moore's Stupid White Men.

Posted by Lisa at 03:26 PM
September 19, 2001
Michael Moore On Security

Wow! Maybe security measures needed to be ramped up a little. Here's a piece from Michael Moore about the subject: Mike's Message 9/12/2001.

Posted by Lisa at 09:06 AM